From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SB8bV-0001Ci-Tk for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 23 Mar 2012 18:48:46 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q2NHdowk029884 for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2012 17:39:50 GMT Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 29050-01 for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2012 17:39:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q2NHdgwF029878 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2012 17:39:43 GMT Message-ID: <1332524384.9740.462.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 17:39:44 +0000 In-Reply-To: <1332520659-12233-2-git-send-email-obi@opendreambox.org> References: <1332520659-12233-1-git-send-email-obi@opendreambox.org> <1332520659-12233-2-git-send-email-obi@opendreambox.org> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2- Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] module.bbclass: sync pkg_post{inst, rm} with kernel.bbclass X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 17:48:46 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 2012-03-23 at 17:37 +0100, Andreas Oberritter wrote: > * Run depmod when the rootfs gets generated. > > Signed-off-by: Andreas Oberritter > --- > meta/classes/module.bbclass | 9 +++++---- > 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) The post install from kernel.bbclass should take care of this at rootfs time so we don't need to duplicate it? Cheers, Richard