From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SCBjs-0000yH-OU for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 17:21:44 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q2QFCiKQ028367; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:12:44 +0100 Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 27512-08; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:12:40 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q2QFCZde028361 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:12:36 +0100 Message-ID: <1332774755.28414.118.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:12:35 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1332772627.14363.1051.camel@phil-desktop> References: <1332694123-5078-1-git-send-email-raj.khem@gmail.com> <1332759689.28414.104.camel@ted> <1332759991.14363.1027.camel@phil-desktop> <1332760875.28414.107.camel@ted> <1332772627.14363.1051.camel@phil-desktop> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2- Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Subject: Re: [PATCH] tune/armv7: Add -mthumb to TUNE_CCARGS X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 15:21:45 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 15:37 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote: > On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 07:13 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 4:21 AM, Richard Purdie > > wrote: > > > On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 12:06 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote: > > >> On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 12:01 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: > > >> > Looking at this file, if the above is true and armv7 can't do anything > > >> > other than thumb, shouldn't we just delete the non-thumb configurations > > >> > for "armv7"? > > >> > > >> It's not totally obvious to me that having a "lowest common denominator" > > >> configuration for ARMv7 is really all that valuable. In fact I would be > > >> slightly surprised if anybody is targetting ARMv7-M with OE at all. > > >> What's the use-case for that? > > > > > > I have no idea, it appears the file doesn't make a lot of sense... > > > > > > > on second thought I think we should delete this tune file since its > > somewhat useless. > > Yes, agreed. It looks like Richard added it originally so, if he > doesn't know ( / has forgotten) what it's good for I would guess that > nobody does. I was proxy for the tune file rewrite, I wasn't responsible for all the details. I'm find with removing it assuming nobody objects. I'm cc'ing Mark in case he remembers anything I don't. Cheers, Richard