From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: Xen 4.2 Release Plan / TODO Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2012 11:43:36 +0100 Message-ID: <1333363416.25602.38.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> References: <1333362402.25602.36.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> <4F7981DE.1030004@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4F7981DE.1030004@citrix.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: David Vrabel Cc: Ian Jackson , "Keir (Xen.org)" , xen-devel List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Mon, 2012-04-02 at 11:39 +0100, David Vrabel wrote: > On 02/04/12 11:26, Ian Campbell wrote: > > > > We have now entered Feature Freeze. Patches which have been posted > > before or which address something on the list below are still acceptable > > (for now, we will gradually be getting stricter about this), everything > > else will be deferred until 4.3 by default. > > How does this affect ARM patches? Are they similarly restricted? Given that ARM support in 4.2 is going to be experimental in nature I suggest that, at least for the time being, ARM patches which do not have an impact on generic or non-ARM code continue to be accepted. Any objections? Ian.