From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Steven Rostedt Subject: Re: ehci_hcd related S3 lockup on ASUS laptops, again Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 14:17:52 -0400 Message-ID: <1334254672.23924.341.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: Alan Stern Cc: jrnieder@gmail.com, Greg KH , USB list , Andrey Rahmatullin , linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2012-04-12 at 13:48 -0400, Alan Stern wrote: > On Thu, 12 Apr 2012, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > On Thu, 2012-04-12 at 13:06 -0400, Alan Stern wrote: > > > > > > Where do I read out the dev info? > > > > > > It should appear in the dmesg log after the system returns from the > > > suspend test. > > > > That's what I thought. I didn't see any message there so I had to ask. > > Oh, my mistake. This routine doesn't get called when pm_test is set to > "devices"; you have to set it to "platform". Sorry about that. And I forgot that the echo isn't enough, and I need to do a pm-suspend too ;-) # dmesg | grep target [ 8829.427534] atl1c 0000:04:00.0: target 3 wakeup 0 error 0 [ 8829.443524] xhci_hcd 0000:03:00.0: target 3 wakeup 1 error 0 [ 8829.459506] iwlwifi 0000:02:00.0: target 3 wakeup 0 error 0 [ 8829.459560] pci 0000:00:1f.3: target 0 wakeup 0 error 0 [ 8829.459607] pci 0000:00:1f.0: target 0 wakeup 0 error 0 [ 8829.475458] ehci_hcd 0000:00:1d.0: target 3 wakeup 1 error 0 [ 8829.491433] ehci_hcd 0000:00:1a.0: target 3 wakeup 1 error 0 [ 8829.507416] pci 0000:00:16.0: target 3 wakeup 0 error 0 -- Steve > > > > Maybe that's the problem here. Steve and Andrey, does it make any > > > difference to the behavior if you do > > > > > > echo on >/sys/bus/pci/devices/0000:00:1a.0/power/control > > > > > > (and likewise for 1d.0) before starting the system suspend? > > > > The two files already are set to "on" (without me doing anything) > > Okay, so that's not the reason... > > Alan Stern