From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SKolu-0003xU-Md for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 19 Apr 2012 12:39:30 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q3JATgWu012680; Thu, 19 Apr 2012 11:29:42 +0100 Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 10906-05; Thu, 19 Apr 2012 11:29:38 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q3JATXOn012674 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 19 Apr 2012 11:29:36 +0100 Message-ID: <1334831377.5336.43.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: niqingliang@insigma.com.cn, Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 11:29:37 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1334821781.1256.63.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1334821451.5336.6.camel@ted> <1334821781.1256.63.camel@localhost.localdomain> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2- Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Subject: Re: [PATCH] qemu: Backport a patch to solve SSE2 instruction emulation issues X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 10:39:30 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 2012-04-19 at 15:49 +0800, Ni Qingliang wrote: > why not update to qemu-1.0.1 ? That requires a bit more work and is not suitable for a point release. We do need to update in the 1.3 cycle but that is a lot more work and will happen later. I think this is therefore a reasonable way to fix the bug in question. Cheers, Richard