From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755889Ab2DXQgs (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Apr 2012 12:36:48 -0400 Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:47906 "EHLO casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755481Ab2DXQgr convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Apr 2012 12:36:47 -0400 Message-ID: <1335285395.28150.204.camel@twins> Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 3/3] math128, x86_64: Implement {mult,add}_u128 in 64bit asm From: Peter Zijlstra To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Juri Lelli , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 18:36:35 +0200 In-Reply-To: <4F96D604.5050709@zytor.com> References: <20120424161039.293018424@chello.nl> <20120424162224.588822231@chello.nl> <4F96D604.5050709@zytor.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2- Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 09:34 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On 04/24/2012 09:10 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > Are you sure that gcc won't simply generate this code already if given > "unsigned __int128"? It might, but I've been told some GCC versions had issues, also lots of archs fall back to libgcc functions.