From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756481Ab2ECJo4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 May 2012 05:44:56 -0400 Received: from mga14.intel.com ([143.182.124.37]:47439 "EHLO mga14.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756041Ab2ECJoy (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 May 2012 05:44:54 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.71,315,1320652800"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="138369641" Message-ID: <1336038292.2656.64.camel@jtkirshe-mobl> Subject: Re: [GIT] Networking From: Jeff Kirsher Reply-To: jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com To: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" Cc: David Miller , torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bpoirier@suse.de, rjw@sisk.pl, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, stephen.s.ko@intel.com Date: Thu, 03 May 2012 02:44:52 -0700 In-Reply-To: <4FA251B5.8080109@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20120503.025951.1393913795357644010.davem@davemloft.net> <4FA24AB1.9010108@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20120503.053246.92708809581536438.davem@davemloft.net> <4FA251B5.8080109@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Organization: Intel Corporation Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-jvzXcgtMPYpsFUz4ry2W" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3 (3.2.3-3.fc16) Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --=-jvzXcgtMPYpsFUz4ry2W Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2012-05-03 at 15:06 +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote: > On 05/03/2012 03:02 PM, David Miller wrote: >=20 > > From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" > > Date: Thu, 03 May 2012 14:36:57 +0530 > >=20 > >> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/4/5/197 > >=20 > > Networking patches not posted to netdev and the Intel ethernet driver > > maintainers will be ignored. > >=20 >=20 >=20 > Jeff Kirsher (Intel ethernet driver maintainer) already acked that > patchset (both patches). >=20 > https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/4/5/376 > https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/4/5/377 >=20 > One went upstream, the other didn't (yet). That's my concern. >=20 > Regards, > Srivatsa S. Bhat >=20 The second has not been ignored or dropped. I pushed one of the patches and we are finishing up the validation on the second patch. I should have the second patch pushed here in the next day or so. I apologize for not being able to push both patches at the same time. Cheers, Jeff --=-jvzXcgtMPYpsFUz4ry2W Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABCgAGBQJPolOUAAoJEOVv75VaS+3OJEkP/02wN4ZZGCdgS09DCDvmcxio r5QlFrAGqfXOENF4H/Tj0HPCat7ai9CyiH8iHwD2lK5lCqDuxHSeKW4Lphf/Eh+b hoOh2ixgDixA+nc23kfVGzpwkkys4FK3Y3CIQw/WA7oVyrlJsIL8USA5wbs0XBis umD09inqnVZWVGyPtWc3ZSGcyRtIH+zBHixBHmt7FOUsoXnYgOgcnkTX2O4JnbCY Gt798nX2f5xRSxvxA4ShAXeQvjL0b0Q4Z8AE6IFvQaftlRREr+tJ7YuCIGg34MXc uDmhK65Sy3yCkPsjaQptslqU3aMwKc0FC+++ZuP/P4z7jIau1NHzeCk/0DIl/3kT o6aeB39ZGwhwFPUvp65HEeCNIUA97Hmokxb0WVYcerWpK1LqePkEGf2HPookeeLf H/sA4eR5larUlPwDLZUT6ttdfRDsd5q4IIm1z+Ea0FRXyredJz3KHGZH0yjzppgh OQle19Ab9r0rrbwfwjDXlEtOiYEsqcO8TLBBxD6eIYg/7gZ2r5zb1/uAvp5fnRdD MGkLvKrUCCnV8IppvM4NJ7bpq4OMe+pAzMc1TX1twTkY8t1Hg7JnWtu4vui9LYO/ K03rbssG7satfBt4ilQ8KqSj0uFkseGXnfLrPu2dsY2MREgD2OxGghoxTa/TBcdH bF48JuisCS56goKHfD5q =1sgJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-jvzXcgtMPYpsFUz4ry2W--