From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SSDHP-0003J2-DY for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 09 May 2012 22:14:35 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q49K4f3P025760; Wed, 9 May 2012 21:04:41 +0100 Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 23680-10; Wed, 9 May 2012 21:04:37 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q49K4ZuF025754 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 9 May 2012 21:04:35 +0100 Message-ID: <1336593873.2494.74.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 21:04:33 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <1336546278.30349.26.camel@ted> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2- Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Cc: saul.wold@intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] kernel-yocto: export GUILT_BASE X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 20:14:35 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 2012-05-09 at 09:08 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 8:42 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > > On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 2:51 AM, Richard Purdie > > wrote: > >> On Tue, 2012-05-08 at 15:23 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > >>> Richard/Saul, > >>> > >>> As Frans Meulenbroeks noted this morning, guilt wasn't functional > >>> in the devshell. The fix was simple enough, and by ensuring that > >>> GUILT_BASE is exported, it works without any extra steps now. > >>> > >>> I wasn't sure if there a better way to call 'up' to the base > >>> method, so I repeated the call to oe_terminal in the do_devshell() > >>> in kernel-yocto.bbclass. > >>> > >>> If there's another approach, let me know and I'll respin the patch. > >> > >> Can't you just set: > >> > >> GUILT_BASE = "meta" > > > > Will that export to the subshell ? I didn't try it .. since I didn't > > think it would. > > I'll give that a go here :) > > With just that set in kernel-yocto.bbclass, and I launch devshell, I get this: > > % guilt applied > Patches directory doesn't exist, try guilt-init > > So unless I misunderstood what you are suggesting, I still need that explicit > export. Sorry, let me be more clear. I meant does: OE_TERMINAL_EXPORTS += "GUILT_BASE" GUILT_BASE = "meta" work? I'm not sure we need everything in the original patch... Cheers, Richard