From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754269Ab2EVRod (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 May 2012 13:44:33 -0400 Received: from mga03.intel.com ([143.182.124.21]:29004 "EHLO mga03.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750747Ab2EVRob (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 May 2012 13:44:31 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.71,315,1320652800"; d="scan'208";a="146363978" Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x2apic, cluster: use all the members of one cluster specified in the smp_affinity mask for the interrupt desintation From: Suresh Siddha Reply-To: Suresh Siddha To: Cyrill Gorcunov Cc: Ingo Molnar , agordeev@redhat.com, yinghai@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 10:42:57 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20120522173922.GC1442@moon> References: <1337643880.1997.166.camel@sbsiddha-desk.sc.intel.com> <1337644682-19854-1-git-send-email-suresh.b.siddha@intel.com> <1337644682-19854-2-git-send-email-suresh.b.siddha@intel.com> <20120522070428.GA15738@gmail.com> <1337707275.1997.184.camel@sbsiddha-desk.sc.intel.com> <20120522173922.GC1442@moon> Organization: Intel Corp Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.0.3 (3.0.3-1.fc15) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <1337708577.1997.187.camel@sbsiddha-desk.sc.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2012-05-22 at 21:39 +0400, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: > Suresh, should not we tune up es7000_cpu_mask_to_apicid code to return > apicid with a cluster number and ORed logical apicid part as done for > x2apic, or the way it resturns apicid now was done by a purpose? Don't know. Those are very old platforms. Not worth tuning them IMHO. thanks, suresh