From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mathieu Desnoyers Subject: Re: DEBUG_RCU vs RCU_DEBUG Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 19:44:40 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1338447584.35237.1429818280158.JavaMail.zimbra__2377.28503202579$1429818353$gmane$org@efficios.com> References: <5534B3CA.6030306@free.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail.efficios.com ([78.47.125.74]) by ltt.polymtl.ca with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YlN3E-0000hv-5r for lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 15:44:46 -0400 In-Reply-To: <5534B3CA.6030306@free.fr> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: lttng-dev-bounces@lists.lttng.org To: Duncan Sands Cc: lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org List-Id: lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org ----- Original Message ----- > I noticed that urcu-qsbr.h checks for RCU_DEBUG being defined while the rest > of > userspace-rcu (0.8.6) checks DEBUG_RCU. Is this a mistake or a cunning plan? Good catch! Even urcu/static/urcu-qsbr.h has a ifdef based on DEBUG_RCU. Will rename the urcu-qsbr.[ch] RCU_DEBUG to DEBUG_RCU, and I will define RCU_DEBUG if DEBUG_RCU is defined in qsbr (for backward compat). Fixes pushed into master, stable-0.8 and stable-0.7. Thanks! Mathieu > > Ciao, Duncan. > > _______________________________________________ > lttng-dev mailing list > lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org > http://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev > -- Mathieu Desnoyers EfficiOS Inc. http://www.efficios.com