From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: [PATCH] xs: set read_thread stacksize Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 08:32:05 +0100 Message-ID: <1338449525.7864.14.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> References: <0cf61ed6ce86de2b61db.1338307000@drall.uk.xensource.com> <201205300856.15605.simon.rowe@eu.citrix.com> <1338370815.31698.26.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> <201205301310.09243.simon.rowe@eu.citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <201205301310.09243.simon.rowe@eu.citrix.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Simon Rowe Cc: Roger Pau Monne , Ian Jackson , David Vrabel , "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Wed, 2012-05-30 at 13:10 +0100, Simon Rowe wrote: > On Wednesday 30 May 2012 10:40:15 Ian Campbell wrote: > > > If this little trick applies to both NetBSD and uclibc too then I guess > > it would be OK, otherwise I think autoconf is necessary. > > It doesn't look to my untrained eye that xenstore is autoconf-aware. The > makefile unilaterally sets USE_PTHREAD for example. It has autoconf stuff available to it, I think, it just hasn't had cause to use it yet... (USE_PTHREAD is a bit of an odd one anyway, it refers only to the client library/cmdline tools and is for building against libc's which don't have pthreads) > Shall I just drop this test for now and if/when xenstore is updated to use > autoconf it can be addressed then? I'd like to here from Roger about what this means for NetBSD and uclibc, if it works on those then I think it is fine to do this. Ian.