From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Artem Bityutskiy Subject: Re: [CFT 09/11] mtd: omap2: add DMA engine support Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2012 16:28:03 +0300 Message-ID: <1339075683.6875.109.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> References: <20120607110610.GB15973@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <1339073375.6875.102.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> <20120607131158.GC15973@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Reply-To: dedekind1@gmail.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-YJJUcFuMMw2jXBEcQEui" Return-path: Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:23658 "EHLO mga11.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759814Ab2FGNYO (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jun 2012 09:24:14 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20120607131158.GC15973@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Russell King - ARM Linux Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, David Woodhouse --=-YJJUcFuMMw2jXBEcQEui Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2012-06-07 at 14:11 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > No, it makes sense to get this stuff via a single tree all together, > because, as you can see from the thread structure, it isn't purely > an OMAP thing. >=20 > The OMAP stuff depends on a core set, as does a bunch of PL08x and > SA11x0 changes. We can't stuff all that through the OMAP tree, that > wouldn't make any sense. >=20 > What probably should happen is that the tip of the OMAP stuff gets > pulled by Tony into his tree, and we share those commits between my > tree and his - and then it doesn't matter what goes in when and by > whom. Oh, sure, sorry, I actually wanted to say that these to patches should _not_ got via the MTD tree. --=20 Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy --=-YJJUcFuMMw2jXBEcQEui Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJP0KxjAAoJECmIfjd9wqK09KQP/3rgp5e2/qOp4C6P4131kiiG AZMSWH2Bq59oiBuz4bnlZqQuCDuVmc5fU6J6YvNqgWmvoPrTFNObDSJ589an2/tm sGx0J0tJYHA8oI7sxNFpjXZrod+JXnIoVsI9qo0Y4heFwmmF/5QFzj/OLsAvskKR MhOHtbctZt6K2huu9wM0XpR/Taken7RwvLR/C1E7somh875XaBb7scdlhkShD3c2 G+Ub7DlMMB6vUaF1Kw9XgCoXvyKYB89I3tS84SzGevWA8JjlA+rOR8GwpzactLqW yQCPLot67xhGRIHYMHbuMM8QC9LlastZ3MP4vzeEYQmioQiLIvgpYSrYcymB9wa8 S0wnOazA7rLrkukbygmYEi437OwHQbmRKpW3fDdFgElXw+Z33Zl0KwEzP2uPMUu9 pd3KhE6ZEF/EnaQFwXQwdm66q5TQ9BocrJTUgUshiLDVuh3hfBrYyO5EHlEEYPhf K1J5Z9dKeOhUXf7/Xt+u+MRwzdVWqXznMj4FAqpkxj+/czfeNY9YYNU2hzho9get epVEQ8bzhSR/BCGWXGxqFOdxqr4wPFZC0V4UbfcnOK8D4MrT+RMxXUV5X2P1OgYs 0ubzL0kelh/ZUzvtOdN6Vl/wsusho2SDUtNhidBmCD7DLh2y5swk1NKrCmm/eZPF 9VTBv5bHPduTJwnEkaqj =MwEk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-YJJUcFuMMw2jXBEcQEui-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <1339075683.6875.109.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> Subject: Re: [CFT 09/11] mtd: omap2: add DMA engine support From: Artem Bityutskiy To: Russell King - ARM Linux Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2012 16:28:03 +0300 In-Reply-To: <20120607131158.GC15973@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20120607110610.GB15973@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <1339073375.6875.102.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> <20120607131158.GC15973@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-YJJUcFuMMw2jXBEcQEui" Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: David Woodhouse , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Reply-To: dedekind1@gmail.com List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , --=-YJJUcFuMMw2jXBEcQEui Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2012-06-07 at 14:11 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > No, it makes sense to get this stuff via a single tree all together, > because, as you can see from the thread structure, it isn't purely > an OMAP thing. >=20 > The OMAP stuff depends on a core set, as does a bunch of PL08x and > SA11x0 changes. We can't stuff all that through the OMAP tree, that > wouldn't make any sense. >=20 > What probably should happen is that the tip of the OMAP stuff gets > pulled by Tony into his tree, and we share those commits between my > tree and his - and then it doesn't matter what goes in when and by > whom. Oh, sure, sorry, I actually wanted to say that these to patches should _not_ got via the MTD tree. --=20 Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy --=-YJJUcFuMMw2jXBEcQEui Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJP0KxjAAoJECmIfjd9wqK09KQP/3rgp5e2/qOp4C6P4131kiiG AZMSWH2Bq59oiBuz4bnlZqQuCDuVmc5fU6J6YvNqgWmvoPrTFNObDSJ589an2/tm sGx0J0tJYHA8oI7sxNFpjXZrod+JXnIoVsI9qo0Y4heFwmmF/5QFzj/OLsAvskKR MhOHtbctZt6K2huu9wM0XpR/Taken7RwvLR/C1E7somh875XaBb7scdlhkShD3c2 G+Ub7DlMMB6vUaF1Kw9XgCoXvyKYB89I3tS84SzGevWA8JjlA+rOR8GwpzactLqW yQCPLot67xhGRIHYMHbuMM8QC9LlastZ3MP4vzeEYQmioQiLIvgpYSrYcymB9wa8 S0wnOazA7rLrkukbygmYEi437OwHQbmRKpW3fDdFgElXw+Z33Zl0KwEzP2uPMUu9 pd3KhE6ZEF/EnaQFwXQwdm66q5TQ9BocrJTUgUshiLDVuh3hfBrYyO5EHlEEYPhf K1J5Z9dKeOhUXf7/Xt+u+MRwzdVWqXznMj4FAqpkxj+/czfeNY9YYNU2hzho9get epVEQ8bzhSR/BCGWXGxqFOdxqr4wPFZC0V4UbfcnOK8D4MrT+RMxXUV5X2P1OgYs 0ubzL0kelh/ZUzvtOdN6Vl/wsusho2SDUtNhidBmCD7DLh2y5swk1NKrCmm/eZPF 9VTBv5bHPduTJwnEkaqj =MwEk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-YJJUcFuMMw2jXBEcQEui-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: dedekind1@gmail.com (Artem Bityutskiy) Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2012 16:28:03 +0300 Subject: [CFT 09/11] mtd: omap2: add DMA engine support In-Reply-To: <20120607131158.GC15973@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20120607110610.GB15973@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <1339073375.6875.102.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> <20120607131158.GC15973@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: <1339075683.6875.109.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thu, 2012-06-07 at 14:11 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > No, it makes sense to get this stuff via a single tree all together, > because, as you can see from the thread structure, it isn't purely > an OMAP thing. > > The OMAP stuff depends on a core set, as does a bunch of PL08x and > SA11x0 changes. We can't stuff all that through the OMAP tree, that > wouldn't make any sense. > > What probably should happen is that the tip of the OMAP stuff gets > pulled by Tony into his tree, and we share those commits between my > tree and his - and then it doesn't matter what goes in when and by > whom. Oh, sure, sorry, I actually wanted to say that these to patches should _not_ got via the MTD tree. -- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: