From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756986Ab2F0M3O (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Jun 2012 08:29:14 -0400 Received: from mga03.intel.com ([143.182.124.21]:1065 "EHLO mga03.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756226Ab2F0M3N (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Jun 2012 08:29:13 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.71,315,1320652800"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="161275137" Message-ID: <1340800392.1799.17.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v7] MTD: LPC32xx SLC NAND driver From: Artem Bityutskiy Reply-To: dedekind1@gmail.com To: Roland Stigge Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, dwmw2@infradead.org, kevin.wells@nxp.com, srinivas.bakki@nxp.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, hechtb@googlemail.com, lars@metafoo.de, b32955@freescale.com, leiwen@marvell.com, linux@arm.linux.org.uk Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 15:33:12 +0300 In-Reply-To: <4FEAF90B.5030809@antcom.de> References: <1339064536-20553-1-git-send-email-stigge@antcom.de> <1340794007.29342.50.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> <4FEAF90B.5030809@antcom.de> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-oqvf5mSleOX1IBuVKUVG" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3 (3.2.3-3.fc16) Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --=-oqvf5mSleOX1IBuVKUVG Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2012-06-27 at 14:14 +0200, Roland Stigge wrote: > Thanks for the note! I'm sending an incremental patch. There was > actually only one place in the two functions that could fail (return > code of lpc32xx_xfer()). Could you please check the MCL patch as well and re-send it against the l2 tree? I've squashed your change into the driver and pushed out, thanks! --=20 Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy --=-oqvf5mSleOX1IBuVKUVG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJP6v2IAAoJECmIfjd9wqK0n70QAL5Sls7HIG0WTZbOpXb+tB6N zUgy+7ysX+ey/dvYFgXdjkcvEm7q5hlmnHF3QySwQFLgzqGwwTmWGebmxbWtXMhG wQz7U8f2FUSA85Q8x3/Qk7Oa3E+11UARCb94zzcoWnTira+rWpEKx1Iiw+V5wQcx OXxH1JX3GHOW5jyZlzWbchrdbm3BTUsZb0M1xBnRfKTb7T3INxNGHliCFOSvo7Ea MvKynEDoKj3X3vQdHbKXpj6s3tSHSME5/lNN+sC7VXU9xboQ5WG7tNHFrsUdcULH 3b5fXB+SZ1Ew6GSb354qt1x/DL+bbjKpRwBqKBY5LwYCeye6ihk8ffIu+sq8sh/g fqTKtqkBuGxK8dWIFYTMkwXqS7FxJsxCk7ZnKU9efsg3RMdmTZgU7tnGW9zjNpf8 YPeHkeJNiA0EeDYvh2rilkLIeJNfGpyl8wOCC1VOP6T5ViB0/Sqv7L1/KgF27RL8 RHF7Z6b4XnKmxaJ9iBFgRos59h8bVQ9167mRFIf5N4AuQkdzRxzyUjwumgqwJgHt ufdWIcolSkLi93u2LBS51J1igc89HwxcJBo7+hxvcN3VfACASzE+SvGBBUPgk1C2 IQMo+COkmmxLyVfk15I1xLYhl+KjalTgqx54+zErXw/jYmr6TFLCiPiWG731F0aL YVkspinXRSbPUcDn4ZLt =v4bj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-oqvf5mSleOX1IBuVKUVG-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <1340800392.1799.17.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v7] MTD: LPC32xx SLC NAND driver From: Artem Bityutskiy To: Roland Stigge Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 15:33:12 +0300 In-Reply-To: <4FEAF90B.5030809@antcom.de> References: <1339064536-20553-1-git-send-email-stigge@antcom.de> <1340794007.29342.50.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> <4FEAF90B.5030809@antcom.de> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-oqvf5mSleOX1IBuVKUVG" Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: srinivas.bakki@nxp.com, lars@metafoo.de, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, leiwen@marvell.com, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kevin.wells@nxp.com, b32955@freescale.com, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, hechtb@googlemail.com, dwmw2@infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Reply-To: dedekind1@gmail.com List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , --=-oqvf5mSleOX1IBuVKUVG Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2012-06-27 at 14:14 +0200, Roland Stigge wrote: > Thanks for the note! I'm sending an incremental patch. There was > actually only one place in the two functions that could fail (return > code of lpc32xx_xfer()). Could you please check the MCL patch as well and re-send it against the l2 tree? I've squashed your change into the driver and pushed out, thanks! --=20 Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy --=-oqvf5mSleOX1IBuVKUVG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJP6v2IAAoJECmIfjd9wqK0n70QAL5Sls7HIG0WTZbOpXb+tB6N zUgy+7ysX+ey/dvYFgXdjkcvEm7q5hlmnHF3QySwQFLgzqGwwTmWGebmxbWtXMhG wQz7U8f2FUSA85Q8x3/Qk7Oa3E+11UARCb94zzcoWnTira+rWpEKx1Iiw+V5wQcx OXxH1JX3GHOW5jyZlzWbchrdbm3BTUsZb0M1xBnRfKTb7T3INxNGHliCFOSvo7Ea MvKynEDoKj3X3vQdHbKXpj6s3tSHSME5/lNN+sC7VXU9xboQ5WG7tNHFrsUdcULH 3b5fXB+SZ1Ew6GSb354qt1x/DL+bbjKpRwBqKBY5LwYCeye6ihk8ffIu+sq8sh/g fqTKtqkBuGxK8dWIFYTMkwXqS7FxJsxCk7ZnKU9efsg3RMdmTZgU7tnGW9zjNpf8 YPeHkeJNiA0EeDYvh2rilkLIeJNfGpyl8wOCC1VOP6T5ViB0/Sqv7L1/KgF27RL8 RHF7Z6b4XnKmxaJ9iBFgRos59h8bVQ9167mRFIf5N4AuQkdzRxzyUjwumgqwJgHt ufdWIcolSkLi93u2LBS51J1igc89HwxcJBo7+hxvcN3VfACASzE+SvGBBUPgk1C2 IQMo+COkmmxLyVfk15I1xLYhl+KjalTgqx54+zErXw/jYmr6TFLCiPiWG731F0aL YVkspinXRSbPUcDn4ZLt =v4bj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-oqvf5mSleOX1IBuVKUVG-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: dedekind1@gmail.com (Artem Bityutskiy) Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 15:33:12 +0300 Subject: [PATCH v7] MTD: LPC32xx SLC NAND driver In-Reply-To: <4FEAF90B.5030809@antcom.de> References: <1339064536-20553-1-git-send-email-stigge@antcom.de> <1340794007.29342.50.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> <4FEAF90B.5030809@antcom.de> Message-ID: <1340800392.1799.17.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, 2012-06-27 at 14:14 +0200, Roland Stigge wrote: > Thanks for the note! I'm sending an incremental patch. There was > actually only one place in the two functions that could fail (return > code of lpc32xx_xfer()). Could you please check the MCL patch as well and re-send it against the l2 tree? I've squashed your change into the driver and pushed out, thanks! -- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: