From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 ]libxl: allow to allocate cpumap with specific size Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 15:58:54 +0100 Message-ID: <1340895534.10942.64.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> References: <20460.28683.727280.950983@mariner.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20460.28683.727280.950983@mariner.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Jackson Cc: "Zhang, Yang Z" , "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , Dario Faggioli List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Thu, 2012-06-28 at 15:54 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > Zhang, Yang Z writes ("[Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 ]libxl: allow to allocate cpumap with specific size"): > > Change from v2: > > Rebase on top of latest head. > > > > Currently, libxl_cpumap_alloc()allocate the cpumap with size of > > number of physical cpus. In some place, we may want to allocate > > specific size of cpumap. This patch allow to pass a argument to > > specific the size that you want to allocate. If pass 0, it means the > > size is equal to number of physical cpus. > > Isn't this same objective achieved in a more general way by Dario's > [PATCH 05 of 10 v2] libxl: rename libxl_cpumap to libxl_bitmap Didn't Dario's patch build on this one, or perhaps incorporate it?