From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dario Faggioli Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 ]libxl: allow to allocate cpumap with specific size Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 17:22:04 +0200 Message-ID: <1340896924.21008.9.camel@Solace> References: <20460.28683.727280.950983@mariner.uk.xensource.com> <1340895534.10942.64.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1335179672897997416==" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1340895534.10942.64.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Campbell Cc: "Zhang, Yang Z" , "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , Ian Jackson List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org --===============1335179672897997416== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-WIxObYJT0cOgTNZ2mLll" --=-WIxObYJT0cOgTNZ2mLll Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2012-06-28 at 15:58 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Thu, 2012-06-28 at 15:54 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > > Zhang, Yang Z writes ("[Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 ]libxl: allow to allocate = cpumap with specific size"): > > > Change from v2: > > > Rebase on top of latest head. > > >=20 > > > Currently, libxl_cpumap_alloc()allocate the cpumap with size of > > > number of physical cpus. In some place, we may want to allocate > > > specific size of cpumap. This patch allow to pass a argument to > > > specific the size that you want to allocate. If pass 0, it means the > > > size is equal to number of physical cpus. > >=20 > > Isn't this same objective achieved in a more general way by Dario's > > [PATCH 05 of 10 v2] libxl: rename libxl_cpumap to libxl_bitmap >=20 Well, there's sure is a clash, as I'm changing the name of map data structure. If you check this in, I'll rebase mine one on top of it. > Didn't Dario's patch build on this one, or perhaps incorporate it? >=20 No, or at least not yet, as this patch is not in yet. Anyway, that's of course possible, just decide what you prefer. :-) Merging this patch and my 05/10 won't be that hard, and I can take care of it, and the same should apply to this "[Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 ]libxl: allow to set more than 31 vcpus". Thanks and Regards, Dario --=20 <> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://retis.sssup.it/people/faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) --=-WIxObYJT0cOgTNZ2mLll Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAk/sdpwACgkQk4XaBE3IOsSdlgCfZ+q4r8Lw/wL0PetmSXrNk3oI 4hYAn3bwYbTjIH6suz1+Z6COYQ7tSnyh =mF1t -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-WIxObYJT0cOgTNZ2mLll-- --===============1335179672897997416== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel --===============1335179672897997416==--