From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joe Perches Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 09/10] net/mlx4_en: Manage flow steering rules with ethtool Date: Sun, 01 Jul 2012 10:31:12 -0700 Message-ID: <1341163872.2032.29.camel@joe2Laptop> References: <1341135823-29039-1-git-send-email-ogerlitz@mellanox.com> <1341135823-29039-10-git-send-email-ogerlitz@mellanox.com> <1341158452.4852.107.camel@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk> <1341160685.2032.15.camel@joe2Laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Or Gerlitz , davem@davemloft.net, roland@kernel.org, yevgenyp@mellanox.com, oren@mellanox.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Hadar Hen Zion To: Ben Hutchings Return-path: Received: from perches-mx.perches.com ([206.117.179.246]:36362 "EHLO labridge.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750864Ab2GARbN (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Jul 2012 13:31:13 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1341160685.2032.15.camel@joe2Laptop> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sun, 2012-07-01 at 09:38 -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > I think this macro is suboptimal because > negated names are easy to misuse. > > I think type is also unnecessary and too > easy to mismatch or keep up to date with > field type changes. > > Perhaps it's better as: > > #define all_zeros_or_all_ones(field) \ > ({ \ > field && (typeof(field))~field; \ > }) Umm, or not. It helps when I actually test the code not just type it into an email client. !(field && (typeof(field))~field)