From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: Security vulnerability process, and CVE-2012-0217 Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2012 14:59:44 +0100 Message-ID: <1341237584.4625.95.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> References: <20448.49637.38489.246434@mariner.uk.xensource.com> <20120623194214.GF2640@US-SEA-R8XVZTX> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: George Dunlap Cc: Ian Jackson , Matt Wilson , "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Thu, 2012-06-28 at 18:45 +0100, George Dunlap wrote: [...] > And I'm going to suggest something else which I think is true, and > relevant to the discussion: > 3. A large majority of deployed Xen instances are run by people not on > the pre-disclosure list. I agree. Although there may be a vendors with massive Xen deployments my instinct is that they will be dwarfed by the sum of all the small individual deployments. > (I think we should pretty much assume that unless explicitly stated, > all opinions are the opinions of the individuals, not the > organizations they work for.) Agreed (on my own behalf ;-)). Ian.