From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: Security vulnerability process, and CVE-2012-0217 Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2012 10:27:15 +0100 Message-ID: <1341394035.31696.22.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> References: <20448.49637.38489.246434@mariner.uk.xensource.com> <4FE1AAB6020000780008AC16@nat28.tlf.novell.com> <20120628193037.4a7c10c2@pyramind.ukuu.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20120628193037.4a7c10c2@pyramind.ukuu.org.uk> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Alan Cox Cc: Ian Jackson , Jan Beulich , "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Thu, 2012-06-28 at 19:30 +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > > > > 8. Predisclosure subscription process, and email address criteria > > Email is not a trustworthy medium. The linux security list was in the > past intercepted. I think it would be wise to add encryption (and the requirement to provide a key) to the pre-disclosure list. I wonder if mailman has per-subscriber encryption capabilities. If not then we should consider moving this particular list to a list manager which can. Apparently whatever the linux-distros list uses can do this (judging from http://oss-security.openwall.org/wiki/mailing-lists/distros) Ian.