From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933479Ab2GDKZK (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jul 2012 06:25:10 -0400 Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([205.233.59.134]:48197 "EHLO merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752063Ab2GDKZI (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jul 2012 06:25:08 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/10] perf, x86: Making hardware events translations available in sysfs From: Peter Zijlstra To: Jiri Olsa Cc: acme@redhat.com, mingo@elte.hu, paulus@samba.org, cjashfor@linux.vnet.ibm.com, fweisbec@gmail.com, eranian@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <1341352848-11833-5-git-send-email-jolsa@redhat.com> References: <1341352848-11833-1-git-send-email-jolsa@redhat.com> <1341352848-11833-5-git-send-email-jolsa@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2012 12:24:54 +0200 Message-ID: <1341397494.2507.88.camel@laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2012-07-04 at 00:00 +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote: > +static struct attribute *events_attr[] = { > + &event_attr_cycles.attr, > + &event_attr_instructions.attr, > + &event_attr_cache_references.attr, > + &event_attr_cache_misses.attr, > + &event_attr_branch_instructions.attr, > + &event_attr_branch_misses.attr, > + &event_attr_bus_cycles.attr, > + &event_attr_stalled_cycles_frontend.attr, > + &event_attr_stalled_cycles_backend.attr, > + &event_attr_ref_cycles.attr, > + NULL, > +}; Hmm, should we do: if (!config) return -EINVAL; or somesuch to clearly indicate an event isn't supported? Its currently a bit of a mixed bag between 0 and -1.. we might want to clean that up too.