From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752228Ab2GEG32 (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Jul 2012 02:29:28 -0400 Received: from mail-gh0-f174.google.com ([209.85.160.174]:53657 "EHLO mail-gh0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751110Ab2GEG31 (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Jul 2012 02:29:27 -0400 From: Wanpeng Li To: Andrew Morton Cc: Johannes Weiner , Michal Hocko , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Wanpeng Li Subject: [PATCH] mm/memcg: replace inexistence move_lock_page_cgroup() by move_lock_mem_cgroup() in comment Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2012 14:28:53 +0800 Message-Id: <1341469733-12104-1-git-send-email-liwp.linux@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.5.4 In-Reply-To: References: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Wanpeng Li Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li --- mm/memcontrol.c | 4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c index 3d318f6..63e36e7 100644 --- a/mm/memcontrol.c +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c @@ -1899,7 +1899,7 @@ again: return; /* * If this memory cgroup is not under account moving, we don't - * need to take move_lock_page_cgroup(). Because we already hold + * need to take move_lock_mem_cgroup(). Because we already hold * rcu_read_lock(), any calls to move_account will be delayed until * rcu_read_unlock() if mem_cgroup_stolen() == true. */ @@ -1921,7 +1921,7 @@ void __mem_cgroup_end_update_page_stat(struct page *page, unsigned long *flags) /* * It's guaranteed that pc->mem_cgroup never changes while * lock is held because a routine modifies pc->mem_cgroup - * should take move_lock_page_cgroup(). + * should take move_lock_mem_cgroup(). */ move_unlock_mem_cgroup(pc->mem_cgroup, flags); } -- 1.7.5.4 From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx153.postini.com [74.125.245.153]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BD0806B0073 for ; Thu, 5 Jul 2012 02:29:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: by obhx4 with SMTP id x4so10533092obh.14 for ; Wed, 04 Jul 2012 23:29:26 -0700 (PDT) From: Wanpeng Li Subject: [PATCH] mm/memcg: replace inexistence move_lock_page_cgroup() by move_lock_mem_cgroup() in comment Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2012 14:28:53 +0800 Message-Id: <1341469733-12104-1-git-send-email-liwp.linux@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: References: Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Andrew Morton Cc: Johannes Weiner , Michal Hocko , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Wanpeng Li From: Wanpeng Li Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li --- mm/memcontrol.c | 4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c index 3d318f6..63e36e7 100644 --- a/mm/memcontrol.c +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c @@ -1899,7 +1899,7 @@ again: return; /* * If this memory cgroup is not under account moving, we don't - * need to take move_lock_page_cgroup(). Because we already hold + * need to take move_lock_mem_cgroup(). Because we already hold * rcu_read_lock(), any calls to move_account will be delayed until * rcu_read_unlock() if mem_cgroup_stolen() == true. */ @@ -1921,7 +1921,7 @@ void __mem_cgroup_end_update_page_stat(struct page *page, unsigned long *flags) /* * It's guaranteed that pc->mem_cgroup never changes while * lock is held because a routine modifies pc->mem_cgroup - * should take move_lock_page_cgroup(). + * should take move_lock_mem_cgroup(). */ move_unlock_mem_cgroup(pc->mem_cgroup, flags); } -- 1.7.5.4 -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org