All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	dave.taht@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	codel@lists.bufferbloat.net, therbert@google.com,
	mattmathis@google.com, nanditad@google.com, ncardwell@google.com,
	andrewmcgr@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2] tcp: TCP Small Queues
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 20:32:00 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1341945120.3265.6030.camel@edumazet-glaptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK6E8=eXMBzG=Zo0N8KWQSNaoekAqAh5N5eY2gE7+BYKJLaOQg@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 10:37 -0700, Yuchung Cheng wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 8:13 AM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> wrote:

> > +
> > +               if (!sock_owned_by_user(sk)) {
> > +                       if ((1 << sk->sk_state) &
> > +                           (TCPF_CLOSE_WAIT | TCPF_ESTABLISHED))
> > +                               tcp_write_xmit(sk,
> > +                                              tcp_current_mss(sk),
> > +                                              0, 0,
> > +                                              GFP_ATOMIC);
> Is this case possible: app does a large send and immediately closes
> the socket. then
> the queue is throttled and tcp_write_xmit is called back when state is
> in TCP_FIN_WAIT1.
> 
> I think tcp_write_xmit should continue regardless of the current state
> because the
> send maybe throttled/delayed but state change is synchronous.
> 

I need testing some allowed states, I think.

Maybe I missed some states, but I dont think we should call
tcp_write_xmit() if socket is now in TIMEWAIT state ?

(because of tasklet delay, we might handle TX completion _after_ socket
state change)

  reply	other threads:[~2012-07-10 18:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-06-28 17:07 [PATCH net-next] fq_codel: report congestion notification at enqueue time Eric Dumazet
2012-06-28 17:51 ` Dave Taht
2012-06-28 18:12   ` Eric Dumazet
2012-06-28 22:56     ` Yuchung Cheng
2012-06-28 23:47       ` Dave Taht
2012-06-29  4:50         ` Eric Dumazet
2012-06-29  5:24           ` Dave Taht
2012-07-04 10:11           ` [RFC PATCH] tcp: limit data skbs in qdisc layer Eric Dumazet
2012-07-09  7:08             ` David Miller
2012-07-09  8:03               ` Eric Dumazet
2012-07-09  8:48                 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-07-09 14:55               ` Eric Dumazet
2012-07-10 13:28                 ` Lin Ming
2012-07-10 15:13                 ` [RFC PATCH v2] tcp: TCP Small Queues Eric Dumazet
2012-07-10 17:06                   ` Eric Dumazet
2012-07-10 17:37                   ` Yuchung Cheng
2012-07-10 18:32                     ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2012-07-11 15:11                   ` Eric Dumazet
2012-07-11 15:16                     ` Ben Greear
2012-07-11 15:25                       ` Eric Dumazet
2012-07-11 15:43                         ` Ben Greear
2012-07-11 15:54                           ` Eric Dumazet
2012-07-11 16:03                             ` Ben Greear
2012-07-11 18:23                     ` Rick Jones
2012-07-11 23:38                       ` Eric Dumazet
2012-07-11 18:44                     ` Rick Jones
2012-07-11 23:49                       ` Eric Dumazet
2012-07-12  7:34                         ` Eric Dumazet
2012-07-12  7:37                           ` David Miller
2012-07-12  7:51                             ` Eric Dumazet
2012-07-12 14:55                               ` Tom Herbert
2012-07-12 13:33                   ` John Heffner
2012-07-12 13:46                     ` Eric Dumazet
2012-07-12 16:44                       ` John Heffner
2012-07-12 16:54                         ` Jim Gettys
2012-06-28 23:52 ` [PATCH net-next] fq_codel: report congestion notification at enqueue time Nandita Dukkipati
2012-06-29  4:18   ` Eric Dumazet
2012-06-29  4:53 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-06-29  5:12   ` David Miller
2012-06-29  5:24     ` Eric Dumazet
2012-06-29  5:29       ` David Miller
2012-06-29  5:50         ` Eric Dumazet
2012-06-29  7:53           ` David Miller
2012-06-29  8:04           ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1341945120.3265.6030.camel@edumazet-glaptop \
    --to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrewmcgr@gmail.com \
    --cc=codel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=mattmathis@google.com \
    --cc=nanditad@google.com \
    --cc=ncardwell@google.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=therbert@google.com \
    --cc=ycheng@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.