From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS)" Subject: Re: Ceph status for Wheezy Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 15:35:52 +0000 Message-ID: <1342020952.12180.28.camel@julia> References: <1341122210.10000.46.camel@julia> <1341786172.24592.49.camel@julia> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail.barcikacomp.hu ([94.248.160.10]:37102 "EHLO mail.barcikacomp.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755920Ab2GKPgF (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jul 2012 11:36:05 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Sage Weil Cc: Ceph Development On Sun, 2012-07-08 at 21:39 -0700, Sage Weil wrote: > On Sun, 8 Jul 2012, Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) wrote: > > It was released since then. But there are several files that I don't > > know where to install. First are some headers under /usr/include/crush : > > crush.h , hash.h , mapper.h and types.h . > I don't think these need to be installed anywhere; they're not currently > packaged. Why do you mention them? They are installed to /usr/include on 'make install'. Didn't know the reason, but will ignore them then. > > What about ceph-disk-activate , ceph-disk-prepare exists , boto_tool and > > ceph-coverage ? They are python scripts except the latter being a shell > > script. > ceph-disk-* are already in ceph. The other two shouldn't be packaged. OK, added them to my packaging as well. Adds a python dependency to the base package. > Is there anything missing on this end? Just checked, the python scripts are installed in your git tree. Adjusted my packaging to match that. What do I miss? Manpages for ceph-disk-activate , ceph-disk-prepare , rest-bench and maybe librados-config . Regards, Laszlo/GCS