On Wed, 2012-07-18 at 10:53 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-07-18 at 10:43 +0100, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> > What could be done is restricting automatic placement to guests that
> > fits on 4 or 8 nodes for 4.2.
> 
> 8 would mean on a 32 node system considering 10,518,300 combinations?
> 
Yes, I was considering that only because I think we'll have something
ready well before 32 nodes systems becomes common. But fine, let's not
bet on what hardware manufacturers will come up with and in what
timeframe... :-)

> 4 would mean on a 32 node system considering 35,960 combinations? On a
> 64 node system it would mean 635,376 combinations.
> 
Exactly.

> If that's the case then lets go with 4 as the limit for 4.2.0.
> 
That is fine with me.

Thanks and Regards,
Dario

-- 
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://retis.sssup.it/people/faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)