From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: [PATCH 0 of 3 v5/leftover] Automatic NUMA placement for xl Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 13:08:44 +0100 Message-ID: <1342786124.26734.108.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> References: <50093C0E.9030809@cantab.net> <5009446E.3000900@amd.com> <1342785606.26734.106.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1342785606.26734.106.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Andre Przywara Cc: Stefano Stabellini , George Dunlap , Juergen Gross , Ian Jackson , xen-devel , David Vrabel , Dario Faggioli List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Fri, 2012-07-20 at 13:00 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > Even if we just blindly store the current result today as the expected > one then when someone makes a tweak we can manually inspect the > differences in the output and say "yes, that seems sane" or "no, that's > mad". The need to do this will be encoded in the diff which makes the > change (since you'd have to patch the test suite...) BTW, this is mostly what we do for tools/libxl/check-xl-{disk,vif}-parse. and what we should do for tools/pygrub/examples/* but so far we only collect examples... Ian.