From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754569Ab2GXNwY (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Jul 2012 09:52:24 -0400 Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.23]:36642 "HELO mailout-de.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1754124Ab2GXNwW (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Jul 2012 09:52:22 -0400 X-Authenticated: #14349625 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19ywTNBgwhyVf4vcpqoQ4zT5Y22+HNMdQO41XBwyY zui7DOPff0IRqp Message-ID: <1343137938.7412.95.camel@marge.simpson.net> Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/34] Memory management performance backports for -stable V2 From: Mike Galbraith To: Hillf Danton Cc: Mel Gorman , Stable , Linux-MM , LKML Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 15:52:18 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: <1343050727-3045-1-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de> <1343109531.7412.47.camel@marge.simpson.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2012-07-24 at 21:18 +0800, Hillf Danton wrote: > On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > FWIW, I'm all for performance backports. They do have a downside though > > (other than the risk of bugs slipping in, or triggering latent bugs). > > > > When the next enterprise kernel is built, marketeers ask for numbers to > > make potential customers drool over, and you _can't produce any_ because > > you wedged all the spiffy performance stuff into the crusty old kernel. > > > Well do your job please. > > Suse 11 SP1 kernel panic on HP hardware > https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/7/24/136 Last time I looked, handling SUSE support issues on LKML was not in my job description. I don't recall seeing anything about taking direction from random LKML subscribers either. -Mike From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx193.postini.com [74.125.245.193]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 46EA46B004D for ; Tue, 24 Jul 2012 09:52:22 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <1343137938.7412.95.camel@marge.simpson.net> Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/34] Memory management performance backports for -stable V2 From: Mike Galbraith Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 15:52:18 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: <1343050727-3045-1-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de> <1343109531.7412.47.camel@marge.simpson.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Hillf Danton Cc: Mel Gorman , Stable , Linux-MM , LKML On Tue, 2012-07-24 at 21:18 +0800, Hillf Danton wrote: > On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > FWIW, I'm all for performance backports. They do have a downside though > > (other than the risk of bugs slipping in, or triggering latent bugs). > > > > When the next enterprise kernel is built, marketeers ask for numbers to > > make potential customers drool over, and you _can't produce any_ because > > you wedged all the spiffy performance stuff into the crusty old kernel. > > > Well do your job please. > > Suse 11 SP1 kernel panic on HP hardware > https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/7/24/136 Last time I looked, handling SUSE support issues on LKML was not in my job description. I don't recall seeing anything about taking direction from random LKML subscribers either. -Mike -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org