From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755511Ab2HGRus (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Aug 2012 13:50:48 -0400 Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:48349 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752435Ab2HGRuq (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Aug 2012 13:50:46 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.67,351,1309762800"; d="scan'208";a="182779197" Subject: Re: do_IRQ: 1.55 No irq handler for vector (irq -1) From: Suresh Siddha Reply-To: Suresh Siddha To: Robert Richter Cc: Borislav Petkov , mingo@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, tglx@linutronix.de, linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org, "Petkov, Borislav" Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 10:47:40 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20120807172806.GK3732@erda.amd.com> References: <1337644682-19854-1-git-send-email-suresh.b.siddha@intel.com> <20120807153149.GI3732@erda.amd.com> <20120807154134.GA7456@aftab.osrc.amd.com> <1344356662.2041.48.camel@sbsiddha-desk.sc.intel.com> <20120807172806.GK3732@erda.amd.com> Organization: Intel Corp Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.0.3 (3.0.3-1.fc15) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <1344361660.27383.4.camel@sbsiddha-desk.sc.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2012-08-07 at 19:28 +0200, Robert Richter wrote: > On 07.08.12 09:24:21, Suresh Siddha wrote: > > Boris, Robert, Can you please send me the complete dmesg > > and /proc/interrupts on a successful boot? > > Sent to you in private mail. Thanks. > > What information are you looking for specifically? Maybe we can > provide something here on the ml. I was looking for what APIC mode and it was a PIC/IO-APIC interrupt. So it looks like it is using logical flat mode and the interrupt was from IO-APIC. So most likely on your system after a successful boot, if you manually set the affinity of one of those SATA/PATA interrupts to a specific logical cpu say 0, I think the interrupt still get routed to other logical cpu's. Can you confirm? thanks, suresh