From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Stephan Linz <linz@li-pro.net>
Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 22:10:36 +0200
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 3/7] microblaze: intc: Registering interrupt
 should return value
In-Reply-To: <1344239199-11445-3-git-send-email-monstr@monstr.eu>
References: <1344239199-11445-1-git-send-email-monstr@monstr.eu>
	<1344239199-11445-3-git-send-email-monstr@monstr.eu>
Message-ID: <1344370237.29456.88.camel@keto>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Am Montag, den 06.08.2012, 09:46 +0200 schrieb Michal Simek: 
> Return value to find out if un/registration was succesful.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
> 
> ---
> v2: Add comment to header file to describe parameters and return codes
> ---
>  arch/microblaze/cpu/interrupts.c              |   16 +++++++++-------
>  arch/microblaze/include/asm/microblaze_intc.h |   11 ++++++++++-
>  2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/microblaze/cpu/interrupts.c b/arch/microblaze/cpu/interrupts.c
> index ee67082..08f6bad 100644
> --- a/arch/microblaze/cpu/interrupts.c
> +++ b/arch/microblaze/cpu/interrupts.c
> @@ -91,14 +91,13 @@ static void disable_one_interrupt(int irq)
>  #endif
>  }
>  
> -/* adding new handler for interrupt */
> -void install_interrupt_handler (int irq, interrupt_handler_t * hdlr, void *arg)
> +int install_interrupt_handler(int irq, interrupt_handler_t *hdlr, void *arg)
>  {
>  	struct irq_action *act;
>  	/* irq out of range */
>  	if ((irq < 0) || (irq > irq_no)) {
>  		puts ("IRQ out of range\n");
> -		return;
> +		return -1;
>  	}
>  	act = &vecs[irq];
>  	if (hdlr) {		/* enable */
> @@ -106,11 +105,14 @@ void install_interrupt_handler (int irq, interrupt_handler_t * hdlr, void *arg)
>  		act->arg = arg;
>  		act->count = 0;
>  		enable_one_interrupt (irq);
> -	} else {		/* disable */
> -		act->handler = (interrupt_handler_t *) def_hdlr;
> -		act->arg = (void *)irq;
> -		disable_one_interrupt (irq);
> +		return 0;
>  	}
> +
> +	/* Disable */
> +	act->handler = (interrupt_handler_t *) def_hdlr;
> +	act->arg = (void *)irq;
> +	disable_one_interrupt(irq);
> +	return 1;
>  }
>  
>  /* initialization interrupt controller - hardware */
> diff --git a/arch/microblaze/include/asm/microblaze_intc.h b/arch/microblaze/include/asm/microblaze_intc.h
> index 6142b9c..e9640f5 100644
> --- a/arch/microblaze/include/asm/microblaze_intc.h
> +++ b/arch/microblaze/include/asm/microblaze_intc.h
> @@ -39,7 +39,16 @@ struct irq_action {
>  	int count; /* number of interrupt */
>  };
>  
> -void install_interrupt_handler (int irq, interrupt_handler_t * hdlr,
> +/**
> + * Register and unregister interrupt handler rutines
> + *
> + * @param irq	IRQ number
> + * @param hdlr	Interrupt handler rutine
> + * @param arg	Pointer to argument which is passed to int. handler rutine
> + * @return	0 if registration pass, 1 if unregistration pass,
> + *		or an error code < 0 otherwise
> + */
> +int install_interrupt_handler(int irq, interrupt_handler_t *hdlr,
>  				       void *arg);

Hi Michal,

why not two different functions here, one for registration, another one
for unregistration? To mee it is puzzling to use a 'install' function
for unregistration ...

... whatever, you should evaluate the return code in fsl_init2() too.

> 
>  int interrupts_init(void);