From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932767Ab2HQAle (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Aug 2012 20:41:34 -0400 Received: from mga14.intel.com ([143.182.124.37]:46449 "EHLO mga14.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753720Ab2HQAlb (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Aug 2012 20:41:31 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.77,782,1336374000"; d="scan'208";a="182005039" Message-ID: <1345164155.1682.871.camel@rui.sh.intel.com> Subject: Re: thermal patches in linux-next From: Zhang Rui To: Amit Kachhap Cc: Stephen Rothwell , Guenter Roeck , Kuninori Morimoto , Andrew Morton , LKML , linux-next@vger.kernel.org Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 08:42:35 +0800 In-Reply-To: References: <1344308038.1682.637.camel@rui.sh.intel.com> <1344494746.1682.669.camel@rui.sh.intel.com> <20120810090859.7ec67594f794c38c52096544@canb.auug.org.au> <1344562866.1682.698.camel@rui.sh.intel.com> <20120810122355.8d6429ac84aa26d296a89e7b@canb.auug.org.au> <1344566688.1682.711.camel@rui.sh.intel.com> <1344577897.1682.724.camel@rui.sh.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2 (3.2.2-1.fc16) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, Amit, On 四, 2012-08-16 at 17:17 +0530, Amit Kachhap wrote: > Hi Zhang, > > I have rebased my patches over your tree and submitted them. Also I > have added them in my tree > git://git.linaro.org/people/amitdanielk/linux.git > exynos_v6_thermal_tree. > > If required add them to your tree. > thanks for your work. I'll review them ASAP. :) thanks, rui > Thanks, > Amit Daniel > > On 14 August 2012 11:45, Amit Kachhap wrote: > > On 10 August 2012 11:21, Zhang Rui wrote: > >> On 五, 2012-08-10 at 10:37 +0530, Amit Kachhap wrote: > >>> On 10 August 2012 08:14, Zhang Rui wrote: > >>> > On 五, 2012-08-10 at 12:23 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > >>> >> Hi Rui, > >>> >> > >>> >> On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 09:41:06 +0800 Zhang Rui > wrote: > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > > And could you please drop these commits > >>> >> > > > ef25a0fe0087963c1611c1c8903886fbea053f76 > >>> >> > > > 09ec52fca274ba88d68df3198de92abdaaff417b > >>> >> > > > ab6d2f029358c917508bf88bbd6a9193a8e39fc8 > >>> >> > > > 66447fa993cbce56b4076f169a56f62350f6c7b8 > >>> >> > > > ec62abb8b46021ca9ee6b8692b26974ace9007f0 > >>> >> > > > 5ecbaf57d7885eedd924e391d91847d3df9fe0f8 > >>> >> > > > 851414b2249afd8c128d29912dfd7060eaea8932 > >>> >> > > > and pull my next branch instead? > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > > That is not how linux-next normally works. Those commits > are in Adnrew's > >>> >> > > quilt series, so you need to ask him to drop them. > However, because of > >>> >> > > the way the akpm tree works, any duplicate patches will > disappear from my > >>> >> > > copy of Andrew's series. > >>> >> > > >>> >> > could you please drop these patches? > >>> >> > these commits either will be or has been re-based on top of > my tree. > >>> >> > >>> >> You should always quote the summary line of commits. Andrew is > using > >>> >> quilt to manage his patches and so those commit ids mean > nothing to him > >>> >> (and they have changed in today's linux-next anyway). > >>> >> > >>> > got it. > >>> > > >>> > Andrew, > >>> > could you please drop these patches from Amit for now? > >>> > > >>> > ARM: exynos: add thermal sensor driver platform data support > >>> > thermal: exynos: register the tmu sensor with the kernel thermal > layer > >>> > thermal: exynos5: add exynos5 thermal sensor driver support > >>> > hwmon: exynos4: move thermal sensor driver to driver/thermal > directory > >>> > thermal: add generic cpufreq cooling implementation > >>> > > >>> > these patches can not build because of the recent thermal > changes, and > >>> > Amit agreed with me to re-base them on top of my tree. > >>> > >>> Or may be it is better to let them be in linux-next as it is and I > >>> will create a separate adaptation patch to work with Zhang's new > >>> thermal enhancements. Actually the above patches are being used > >>> internally. > >>> > >> well, as the patches has not been in Linus' tree, and they do not > >> compile, IMO, it would be better to fix it in the patch rather than > >> create an incremental one. > >> I can rewrite the generic cpufreq cooling patch if you do not have > time > >> to. > > Ok agreed Zhang. I am currently fixing my patches for the new > > framework. Will submit everything in a couple of days. > > > > Thanks, > > Amit Daniel > >> > >> thanks, > >> rui > >> > >>> Thanks, > >>> Amit Daniel > >>> > >>> > > >>> > thanks, > >>> > rui > >>> > > >> > >> >