All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
To: xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Cc: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>,
	Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/6] Clarify the scope of the process to just the hypervisor project
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 11:37:51 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1345718274-7900-3-git-send-email-ian.campbell@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1345718230.12501.79.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com>

Other projects are handled on a best effort basis by the project lead
with the assistance of the security team.

See <20448.49637.38489.246434@mariner.uk.xensource.com>, section
    "9. Vulnerability process scope"
---
 security_vulnerability_process.html |    3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/security_vulnerability_process.html b/security_vulnerability_process.html
index ee42402..ddd88a1 100644
--- a/security_vulnerability_process.html
+++ b/security_vulnerability_process.html
@@ -77,6 +77,9 @@ if(ns4)_d.write("<scr"+"ipt type=text/javascript src=/globals/mmenuns4.js><\/scr
     will treat with respect the requests of discoverers, or other vendors, who
     report problems to us.</p>
 
+    <h2>Scope of this process</h2>
+    <p>This process primarily covers the <a href="http://www.xen.org/products/xenhyp.html">Xen Hypervisor Project</a>. Vulnerabilties reported against other Xen.org projects will be handled on a best effort basis by the relevant Project Lead together with the security team.</p>
+
     <h2>Specific process</h2>
     <ol type="1">
     <li><p>We request that anyone who discovers a vulnerability in xen.org
-- 
1.7.10.4

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-08-23 10:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-06-19 18:16 Security vulnerability process, and CVE-2012-0217 Ian Jackson
2012-06-20  8:49 ` Jan Beulich
2012-06-20  9:45   ` George Dunlap
2012-06-20 10:32     ` Jan Beulich
2012-07-02 13:59       ` Ian Campbell
2012-07-02 14:58         ` Jan Beulich
2012-07-02 15:04           ` Ian Campbell
2012-07-02 15:17         ` Alan Cox
2012-07-02 15:20           ` Ian Campbell
2012-06-28 18:30   ` Alan Cox
2012-07-04  9:27     ` Ian Campbell
2012-07-04 10:04       ` John Haxby
2012-06-29 10:26   ` George Dunlap
2012-06-29 10:41     ` Jan Beulich
2012-07-02 14:00   ` Ian Campbell
2012-06-23 19:42 ` Matt Wilson
2012-06-28 17:45   ` George Dunlap
2012-07-02 13:59     ` Ian Campbell
2012-06-27 18:07 ` Thomas Goirand
2012-06-27 19:14   ` Alan Cox
2012-06-27 19:30   ` Sander Eikelenboom
2012-06-28  9:28   ` Lars Kurth
2012-07-02 13:58     ` Ian Campbell
2012-07-02 14:51       ` Jan Beulich
2012-07-02 14:57         ` Ian Campbell
2012-07-03 22:03     ` Matt Wilson
2012-07-04 10:33       ` Ian Campbell
2012-07-04 11:24       ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-04 12:36         ` George Dunlap
2012-07-04 12:52           ` Jan Beulich
2012-07-04 12:56             ` George Dunlap
2012-07-04 13:01               ` Jan Beulich
2012-07-04 13:30               ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-04 14:09                 ` Jan Beulich
2012-07-04 15:09                   ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-06 14:36                     ` John Haxby
2012-07-06 16:39                 ` Matthew Allen
2012-07-06 17:24                   ` George Dunlap
2012-06-29 10:01   ` George Dunlap
2012-06-29 15:48     ` Thomas Goirand
2012-07-02 13:59     ` Ian Campbell
2012-07-02 15:13       ` Alan Cox
2012-07-03 11:12       ` George Dunlap
2012-07-03 14:18         ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-08-23 10:37 ` Ian Campbell
2012-08-23 10:37   ` [PATCH 1/6] Clarify what info predisclosure list members may share during an embargo Ian Campbell
2012-08-23 10:37   ` [PATCH 2/6] Clarifications to predisclosure list subscription instructions Ian Campbell
2012-08-23 10:37   ` Ian Campbell [this message]
2012-08-23 10:37   ` [PATCH 4/6] Discuss post-embargo disclosure of potentially controversial private decisions Ian Campbell
2012-08-23 10:37   ` [PATCH 5/6] Patch review, expert advice and targetted fixes Ian Campbell
2012-08-23 10:37   ` [PATCH 6/6] Declare version 1.3 Ian Campbell
2012-09-24 11:25   ` Security vulnerability process, and CVE-2012-0217 [vote?] Lars Kurth
2012-10-01 16:38     ` Ian Jackson
2012-10-03 17:03       ` Lars Kurth
2012-10-04  8:39       ` Lars Kurth

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1345718274-7900-3-git-send-email-ian.campbell@citrix.com \
    --to=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
    --cc=Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.