From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: Test report: Migration from 4.1 to 4.2 works Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 12:09:13 +0100 Message-ID: <1346411353.27277.183.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> References: <20544.39460.499127.781598@mariner.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20544.39460.499127.781598@mariner.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Jackson Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Fri, 2012-08-31 at 12:04 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > Migration 4.1 xend -> 4.2 xend > OK > > Migration 4.2 -> 4.1 (xend or xl) We don't support this, so I'm not too concerned about the failures. > xend: Fails, guest ends up destroyed > xl: Fails, xl tries to resume at sender but guest gets BUG (see below) > This is probably a guest bug? > > Migration 4.1 xend -> 4.2 xl > Needs to be done with xl > Stop xend on source, which leaves domain running and manipulable by xl > xl migrate -C /etc/xen/debian.guest.osstest.cfg domain potato-beetle > Works. This is great. We should write this down somewhere. I guess http://wiki.xen.org/wiki/XL#Upgrading_from_xend ? > However, xl fails on config files which are missing the final > newline. This should be fixed for 4.2. Since that I suppose involves the parser are you going to do that? Did you also try xl 4.1 -> 4.2? Ian.