From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Xen 4.2 TODO / Release Plan Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 16:12:12 +0100 Message-ID: <1346425932.27277.230.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> References: <1346148361.9975.3.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1346148361.9975.3.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: xen-devel Cc: "george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com" , Jan Beulich List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Tue, 2012-08-28 at 11:06 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > hypervisor, nice to have: > > * [BUG(?)] Under certain conditions, the p2m_pod_sweep code will > stop halfway through searching, causing a guest to crash even if > there was zeroed memory available. This is NOT a regression > from 4.1, and is a very rare case, so probably shouldn't be a > blocker. (In fact, I'd be open to the idea that it should wait > until after the release to get more testing.) > (George Dunlap) > * fix high change rate to CMOS RTC periodic interrupt causing > guest wall clock time to lag (possible fix outlined, needs to be > put in patch form and thoroughly reviewed/tested for unwanted > side effects, Jan Beulich) I have a feeling one or both of these might be fixed already, is that true? > * S3 regression(s?) reported by Ben Guthro (Ben & Jan Beulich) AIUI this one isn't though. Ian.