From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1753892Ab2IFHuz (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Thu, 6 Sep 2012 03:50:55 -0400
Received: from mail.gw90.de ([188.40.100.199]:57405 "EHLO mail.gw90.de"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751423Ab2IFHuy (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 6 Sep 2012 03:50:54 -0400
Message-ID: <1346917833.10162.4.camel@mattotaupa>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/exynos: fix double call of
 drm_prime_(init/destroy)_file_private
From: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
To: InKi Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
Cc: Mandeep Singh Baines <msb@chromium.org>,
        =?ISO-8859-1?Q?St=E9phane?= Marchesin <marcheu@chromium.org>,
        Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2012 09:50:33 +0200
In-Reply-To: <CAAQKjZPGefy9333AGTN1iwxWuCiPvi85raDE7ijDmRcm9PPWWw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1346881623-388-1-git-send-email-msb@chromium.org>
	 <CAAQKjZPGefy9333AGTN1iwxWuCiPvi85raDE7ijDmRcm9PPWWw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature";
	boundary="=-wYfxKnoJf6QGJph5itLH"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.4.3-1 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org


--=-wYfxKnoJf6QGJph5itLH
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Dear Inki Dae,


Am Donnerstag, den 06.09.2012, 11:35 +0900 schrieb InKi Dae:

> 2012/9/6 Mandeep Singh Baines <msb@chromium.org>:
> > The double invocations are incorrect but seem to be safe so I don't
> > think this will fix any bugs.
> >
> > Before:
> >
> > [    7.639366] drm_prime_init_file ee3675d0
> > [    7.639377] drm_prime_init_file ee3675d0
> > [    7.639507] drm_prime_destroy_file ee3675d0
> > [    7.639518] drm_prime_destroy_file ee3675d0
> > [    7.639802] drm_prime_init_file ee372390
> > [    7.639810] drm_prime_init_file ee372390
> > [    8.473316] drm_prime_init_file ee356390
> > [    8.473331] drm_prime_init_file ee356390
> >
> > After:
> >
> > [    6.363842] drm_prime_init_file edc2e5d0
> > [    6.363994] drm_prime_destroy_file edc2e5d0
> > [    6.364260] drm_prime_init_file edc2e750
> > [    8.004837] drm_prime_init_file ee36ded0
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mandeep Singh Baines <msb@chromium.org>
> > CC: St=C3=A9phane Marchesin <marcheu@chromium.org>
> > CC: Pawel Osciak <posciak@google.com>
> > CC: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
> > CC: Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.shim@samsung.com>
> > CC: Seung-Woo Kim <sw0312.kim@samsung.com>
> > CC: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
> > CC: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
> > CC: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
>=20
> remove all CCs

I guess they were generated by some script. So they should be fine, no?

Mandeep, if you put CC in here those people should be CCed in real. `git
send-email` should take care of that but I do not see everyone in the CC
field. Or does `git send-email` use blind carbon copy (BCC) field?

> and can you send it again using text mode?

At least to the list it was send in plain text mode.

> your patch is messed up when I try to get patch file.

Everything is fine on my side. Especially since Mandeep used `git
send-email` which should do everything correctly.

> Thanks.
> Inki Dae

In your From address your name is written InKi with capital K. Which one
is correct?


Thanks,

Paul

--=-wYfxKnoJf6QGJph5itLH
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEABECAAYFAlBIVckACgkQPX1aK2wOHVi8JwCfY1/NR4mjORzqKnZnYl9ST9uA
R7oAniE3xuShJwAeuNtwGjbiKSU8ZjcO
=FMUD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-wYfxKnoJf6QGJph5itLH--