From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 064EA2C007E for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 08:47:21 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <1348699617.2443.12.camel@pasglop> Subject: Re: /dev/port under powerpc From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Serge Teodori Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 08:46:57 +1000 In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 2012-09-25 at 14:27 +0200, Serge Teodori wrote: > Hello, > I am curently doing some cleanup, and noticed 'arch_has_dev_port()' > could be omitted if 'arch/powerpc/configs/*' would be update with > 'CONFIG_DEVPORT'. My question is, which ones have or have not an 'isa > pci bridge'. It's a runtime detection thing, CONFIG is not useful. Cheers, Ben.