All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@intel.com>
To: srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
	mingo@redhat.com, x86@kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com,
	chuansheng.liu@intel.com
Subject: [PATCH RESEND] x86/fixup_irq: Clean the offlining CPU from the irq affinity mask
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 07:45:22 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1348703122.19514.17.camel@cliu38-desktop-build> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1348681092.19514.10.camel@cliu38-desktop-build>


When one CPU is going offline, and fixup_irqs() will re-set the
irq affinity in some cases, we should clean the offlining CPU from
the irq affinity.

The reason is setting offlining CPU as of the affinity is useless.
Moreover, the smp_affinity value will be confusing when the
offlining CPU come back again.

Example:
For irq 93 with 4 CPUS, the default affinity f(1111),
normal cases: 4 CPUS will receive the irq93 interrupts.

When echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu3/online, just CPU0,1,2 will
receive the interrupts.

But after the CPU3 is online again, we will not set affinity,the result
will be:
the smp_affinity is f, but still just CPU0,1,2 can receive the interrupts.

So we should clean the offlining CPU from irq affinity mask
in fixup_irqs().

Reviewed-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: liu chuansheng <chuansheng.liu@intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/irq.c |   21 +++++++++++++++++----
 1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c b/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c
index d44f782..ead0807 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c
@@ -239,10 +239,13 @@ void fixup_irqs(void)
 	struct irq_desc *desc;
 	struct irq_data *data;
 	struct irq_chip *chip;
+	int cpu = smp_processor_id();
 
 	for_each_irq_desc(irq, desc) {
 		int break_affinity = 0;
 		int set_affinity = 1;
+		bool set_ret = false;
+
 		const struct cpumask *affinity;
 
 		if (!desc)
@@ -256,7 +259,8 @@ void fixup_irqs(void)
 		data = irq_desc_get_irq_data(desc);
 		affinity = data->affinity;
 		if (!irq_has_action(irq) || irqd_is_per_cpu(data) ||
-		    cpumask_subset(affinity, cpu_online_mask)) {
+		    cpumask_subset(affinity, cpu_online_mask) ||
+		    !cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, data->affinity)) {
 			raw_spin_unlock(&desc->lock);
 			continue;
 		}
@@ -277,9 +281,18 @@ void fixup_irqs(void)
 		if (!irqd_can_move_in_process_context(data) && chip->irq_mask)
 			chip->irq_mask(data);
 
-		if (chip->irq_set_affinity)
-			chip->irq_set_affinity(data, affinity, true);
-		else if (!(warned++))
+		if (chip->irq_set_affinity) {
+			struct cpumask mask;
+			cpumask_copy(&mask, affinity);
+			cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, &mask);
+			switch (chip->irq_set_affinity(data, &mask, true)) {
+			case IRQ_SET_MASK_OK:
+				cpumask_copy(data->affinity, &mask);
+			case IRQ_SET_MASK_OK_NOCOPY:
+				set_ret = true;
+			}
+		}
+		if ((!set_ret) && !(warned++))
 			set_affinity = 0;
 
 		/*
-- 
1.7.0.4




  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-09-26 14:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-09-26 17:38 [PATCH RESEND] x86/fixup_irq: Clean the offlining CPU from the irq affinity mask Chuansheng Liu
2012-09-26  8:49 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-09-26  8:51   ` Liu, Chuansheng
2012-09-26  8:56   ` Liu, Chuansheng
2012-09-26  9:02     ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-09-26 23:45 ` Chuansheng Liu [this message]
2012-09-26 15:47   ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-09-26 16:03   ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-09-26 17:06     ` Suresh Siddha
2012-09-26 17:30       ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-09-26 22:46         ` Suresh Siddha
2012-09-27 18:42           ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-09-27 19:20             ` Suresh Siddha
2012-09-27 20:33               ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-10-09  8:51           ` Liu, Chuansheng

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1348703122.19514.17.camel@cliu38-desktop-build \
    --to=chuansheng.liu@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.