From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2012 14:08:13 -0500
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] yaffs2: Fix GCC 4.6 compile warnings
In-Reply-To: <20121009185114.GC1137@bill-the-cat> (from trini@ti.com on Tue
	Oct  9 13:51:14 2012)
Message-ID: <1349809693.26044.10@snotra>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

On 10/09/2012 01:51:14 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 01:09:22PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> > On 10/06/2012 11:59:17 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> > >Hi Anatolij,
> > >
> > >On Sat,  6 Oct 2012 11:31:03 +0200, Anatolij Gustschin  
> <agust@denx.de>
> > >wrote:
> > >
> > >> Fix:
> > >> yaffs_guts.c: In function 'yaffs_check_chunk_erased':
> > >> yaffs_guts.c:324:6: warning: variable 'result' set but not used
> > >> [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
> > [snip]
> > >Tested-by: Albert ARIBAUD <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net>
> > >
> > >This effectively makes VCMA9 and smdk2410 (the two boards which had
> > >the yaffs warnings) build clean.
> >
> > It takes care of the warnings, but I still see this:
> >
> > Configuring for VCMA9 board...
> > make: *** [u-boot] Error 139
> 
> The linaro and ELDK 4.2, 5.2 toolchains build this fine.  I would
> suggest grabbing one of those for ARM.

I'll give one of them a try, but is it expected that the compiler will  
be able to do 64/32 division without __udivdi3?  Shouldn't yaffs2 be  
using lldiv() or do_div()?

-Scott