From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from oproxy11-pub.bluehost.com ([173.254.64.10]:43646 "HELO oproxy11-pub.bluehost.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751906Ab2J1Pht (ORCPT ); Sun, 28 Oct 2012 11:37:49 -0400 Received: from [70.15.155.205] (port=41724 helo=[206.223.20.150]) by host200.hostmonster.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1TSUvs-0007Qh-7l for linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 09:37:48 -0600 Message-ID: <1351438667.3551.29.camel@hp-dhlii> (sfid-20121028_163753_641466_6543E79C) Subject: Re: Bandwidth monitoring From: "David H. Lynch Jr." Reply-To: dhlii@dlasys.net To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2012 11:37:47 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: >From: Christian Lamparter >>># iw dev wlanX set channel 1 HT40+ (or HT40-/HT20) >> >> This is setting up to send on channel 1 HT40+ correct ? >yes, I hope so. Thanks >> Wireshark appears to handle RadioTap - I am seeing lots of other >flags >> etc. but not BW40. >It depends on the version. Here's a screenshot >from wireshark 1.8.2: Thanks >> Googling Radiotap produces lots of comments that suggest that >>Radiotap >> headers - send and receive are not necescarily complete or accurate >>from >> device to device - is that a reasonable conclusion ? >Most mac80211 driver should report rx'ed MCS information. >At least ath9k, ath9k_htc, brcmsmac, carl9170, iwlagn, iwllegacy, >mwl8k, >rt2800*, rtl8192* do Using carl9170 so that should be OK. >What might not work is: injecting frames with MCS rates [no code >in ieee80211_parse_tx_radiotap for that?]... So maybe the issue >is indeed at the other end? Assuming Carl9170/AR9170's at both ends But if I am am using iw to set monitor mode mode, channel, and bandwidth, And using Raw sockets injection with a radiotap header that has no frequency/channel/bandwidth information, I should then be able to receive that packet on another system with an AR9170 and 1.8.2 Wireshark and the BW40 flag should be true ? I need to do something that involves sending HT40 packets in a completely different context. But I do not have a spectrum analyzer to confirm that i am actually sending what I want. So I have been using airmon, wireshark, .... But i need to be able to send and verify an HT40 packet by some somewhat normal means, to assure myself that my receiving end wireshark hardware/driver/software combination can tell me what i need to know. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@... More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html