From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751693Ab3AUHJr (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Jan 2013 02:09:47 -0500 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.10]:60450 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750919Ab3AUHJq (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Jan 2013 02:09:46 -0500 Message-ID: <1358752180.4994.65.camel@marge.simpson.net> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] sched: simplify the select_task_rq_fair() From: Mike Galbraith To: Michael Wang Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, mingo@kernel.org, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 08:09:40 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1358750523.4994.55.camel@marge.simpson.net> References: <1356588535-23251-1-git-send-email-wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <50ED384C.1030301@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1357977704.6796.47.camel@marge.simpson.net> <1357985943.6796.55.camel@marge.simpson.net> <1358155290.5631.19.camel@marge.simpson.net> <50F79256.1010900@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1358654997.5743.17.camel@marge.simpson.net> <50FCACE3.5000706@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1358743128.4994.33.camel@marge.simpson.net> <50FCCCF5.30504@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1358750523.4994.55.camel@marge.simpson.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:p9S0mh58TsJ+gBUI3yhrQ13RGIg9lrrHih+KC+2N5gu s9Q8Nxn/xWhnPiuDc2coYyx9+G5EA6kQ+tG5ACM51nz6F4fExo uyS6VtQbXPwaNmnAKB0Am4lpbUOPGitSfK8YWfqgJUWfpZfASD OCUAnQBSoPVUp0IMkBIhbaRUB5qhGMZAKSK5xxLVD31EZZN+Or iWkv/8QS+KWHBngk2ntJDMomVFOSONetAZf3D6z+bdQCgJAQ55 Iq7rOX5kvrdljPLhYK5sNJph7eAzCuomC7qoTuEfpwmTxKzPp/ Pr5UVcYJXFPqtgwWmFGRspOq20UN4E8Pgzutso/sA3WT4Sw4tT L0OAN/6/7dlRd8uRwUEdPoVo747Ybn727y3xznDfiNP3Exs9aG AK5Ti/6mX8DEw== Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2013-01-21 at 07:42 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote: > On Mon, 2013-01-21 at 13:07 +0800, Michael Wang wrote: > > May be we could try change this back to the old way later, after the aim > > 7 test on my server. > > Yeah, something funny is going on. Never entering balance path kills the collapse. Asking wake_affine() wrt the pull as before, but allowing us to continue should no idle cpu be found, still collapsed. So the source of funny behavior is indeed in balance_path. -Mike