From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 16:02:54 -0600
Subject: [U-Boot] [Patch v3] Consolidate bool type
In-Reply-To: <51005DCD.3010706@freescale.com> (from yorksun@freescale.com on
	Wed Jan 23 16:01:49 2013)
References: <1358977307-17350-1-git-send-email-yorksun@freescale.com>
	<51005A1C.1010308@freescale.com> <1358977924.9710.8@snotra>
	<51005DCD.3010706@freescale.com>
Message-ID: <1358978574.9710.10@snotra>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

On 01/23/2013 04:01:49 PM, York Sun wrote:
> On 01/23/2013 01:52 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
> > On 01/23/2013 03:46:04 PM, York Sun wrote:
> >> On 01/23/2013 01:41 PM, York Sun wrote:
> >> I should put RFC in the subject as I am not able to compile all  
> ARCH
> >> myself.
> >
> > So how do you see this patch becoming non-RFC?  I think most people
> > don't have every single toolchain.  You should at least get a  
> toolchain
> > for a couple major architectures such as ARM.  Usually RFC is for  
> when
> > you know the patch has issues, and don't want it applied yet even if
> > nobody else finds fault with it.
> >
> 
> I know this version has problem. I am hoping more people get involved
> and test what they can. I tried the arm toolchain you pointed to me. I
> couldn't run MAKEALL for arm.

Even before your patch, using USE_PRIVATE_LIBGCC?  How many boards  
failed?

-Scott