From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760079Ab3BHKJA (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Feb 2013 05:09:00 -0500 Received: from mail-wg0-f50.google.com ([74.125.82.50]:53240 "EHLO mail-wg0-f50.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760016Ab3BHKI6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Feb 2013 05:08:58 -0500 Message-ID: <1360318129.7515.278.camel@mfleming-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3 v3] selftests: Add tests for efivarfs From: Matt Fleming To: Jeremy Kerr Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, Lingzhu Xiang , Dave Young Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2013 10:08:49 +0000 In-Reply-To: <5114CE00.6050307@ozlabs.org> References: <1360162088.142733.191120808822.0.gpush@pecola> <1360162088.143076.913706486688.1.gpush@pecola> <20130207151333.f01d415c.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <5114CE00.6050307@ozlabs.org> Organization: Intel Corporation (UK) Ltd. - Registered No. 1134945 - Pipers Way, Swindon SN3 1RJ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.4.4 (3.4.4-2.fc17) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2013-02-08 at 18:05 +0800, Jeremy Kerr wrote: > However, the tests expose a bug at the moment, so run_tests will fail. > Matt will have that fixed soon though :) In which case, would it make more sense for me to take these tests through the efi tree? I'm fine either way, I'm just looking for the least surprising option. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matt Fleming Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3 v3] selftests: Add tests for efivarfs Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2013 10:08:49 +0000 Message-ID: <1360318129.7515.278.camel@mfleming-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <1360162088.142733.191120808822.0.gpush@pecola> <1360162088.143076.913706486688.1.gpush@pecola> <20130207151333.f01d415c.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <5114CE00.6050307@ozlabs.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <5114CE00.6050307-mnsaURCQ41sdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-efi-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Jeremy Kerr Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Lingzhu Xiang , Dave Young List-Id: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2013-02-08 at 18:05 +0800, Jeremy Kerr wrote: > However, the tests expose a bug at the moment, so run_tests will fail. > Matt will have that fixed soon though :) In which case, would it make more sense for me to take these tests through the efi tree? I'm fine either way, I'm just looking for the least surprising option.