From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757202Ab3BKNDA (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Feb 2013 08:03:00 -0500 Received: from mailout01.c08.mtsvc.net ([205.186.168.189]:49979 "EHLO mailout01.c08.mtsvc.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757080Ab3BKNC6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Feb 2013 08:02:58 -0500 Message-ID: <1360587768.3454.2.camel@thor.lan> Subject: Re: [Bisected] [-next-20130204] usb/hcd: irq 18: nobody cared From: Peter Hurley To: Yinghai Lu Cc: Bjorn Helgaas , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Alan Stern , Lan Tianyu , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Jiri Kosina , linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 08:02:48 -0500 In-Reply-To: References: <1360466060.3703.15.camel@thor.lan> <1360506199.3461.5.camel@thor.lan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.6.3-0pjh1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authenticated-User: 125194 peter@hurleysoftware.com Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 2013-02-10 at 22:40 -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote: > On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 6:23 AM, Peter Hurley wrote: > >> On Sat, 2013-02-09 at 22:14 -0500, Peter Hurley wrote: > >>> On Tue, 2013-02-05 at 15:26 -0500, Alan Stern wrote: > >>> > On Tue, 5 Feb 2013, Peter Hurley wrote: > >>> > > >>> > > With -next-20130204: > >>> > > > >>> > > [ 33.855570] irq 18: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option) > >>> > > [ 33.855580] Pid: 0, comm: swapper/4 Not tainted 3.8.0-next-20130204-xeon #20130204 > >>> > > [ 33.855582] Call Trace: > >>> > > [ 33.855585] [] __report_bad_irq+0x36/0xe0 > >>> > > [ 33.855600] [] note_interrupt+0x1aa/0x200 > >>> > > [ 33.855606] [] ? mwait_idle+0x82/0x1b0 > >>> > > [ 33.855610] [] handle_irq_event_percpu+0xc9/0x260 > >>> > > [ 33.855614] [] handle_irq_event+0x48/0x70 > >>> > > [ 33.855618] [] handle_fasteoi_irq+0x5a/0x100 > >>> > > [ 33.855624] [] handle_irq+0x22/0x40 > >>> > > [ 33.855630] [] do_IRQ+0x5a/0xd0 > >>> > > [ 33.855636] [] common_interrupt+0x6d/0x6d > >>> > > [ 33.855638] [] ? rcu_eqs_enter_common+0x4a/0x320 > >>> > > [ 33.855646] [] ? mwait_idle+0x82/0x1b0 > >>> > > [ 33.855649] [] ? mwait_idle+0x29/0x1b0 > >>> > > [ 33.855653] [] cpu_idle+0x116/0x130 > >>> > > [ 33.855658] [] start_secondary+0x251/0x258 > >>> > > [ 33.855660] handlers: > >>> > > [ 33.855664] [] usb_hcd_irq > >>> > > [ 33.855667] Disabling IRQ #18 > >>> > > > >> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53561 > >> > >> Maybe this is some interaction with all the new ACPI code and fixes > >> written in those 8 days. > > > > interrupt routing seems get changed: > > next: > > 5: 0 0 0 0 0 > > 0 0 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi snd_ctxfi > > 18: 99970 13 16 20 99940 > > 13 13 16 IO-APIC-fasteoi uhci_hcd:usb4 > > v3.8-rc7: > > 18: 424 15 11 112 420 > > 16 18 105 IO-APIC-fasteoi uhci_hcd:usb4, snd_ctxfi > > > > These messages in the bad dmesg log are interesting since PCI INT A is routed > > on > > irq 18 with the kernels that work. > > [ 8.983246] pci 0000:00:1e.0: can't derive routing for PCI INT A > > [ 8.983600] snd_ctxfi 0000:09:02.0: PCI INT A: no GSI - using ISA IRQ 5 > > ... > > > > acpi_pci_irq_add_prt() add wrong bus for that bridge, because that > > that bridge is not scanned. > > > > Will check if I can produce one patch for it. > > Hi Peter, > > Can you try attached debug patch? Fixed, thanks. Regards, Peter Hurley