From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re:  xennet: skb rides the rocket: 20 slots
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 11:37:15 +0000
Message-ID: <1363088235.29599.0.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com>
References: <72958707.20130104172854@eikelenboom.it>
	<1357556115.7989.13.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com>
	<50EB8091.90705@oracle.com> <323202711.20130108215503@eikelenboom.it>
	<50ED1800.1080208@oracle.com>
	<20130109150850.GI18395@phenom.dumpdata.com>
	<50EEA46E.7000604@oracle.com>
	<1357820816.9456.15.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com>
	<50EFC079.1000601@oracle.com>
	<1357898207.9456.112.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com>
	<291EDFCB1E9E224A99088639C4762022012CCFEB82DE@LONPMAILBOX01.citrite.net>
	<1357899363.9456.116.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com>
	<50F3D269.6030601@oracle.com>
	<19010312768.20130124094542@eikelenboom.it>
	<422733537.20130309135735@eikelenboom.it> <513C18AC.3090207@oracle.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
In-Reply-To: <513C18AC.3090207@oracle.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: ANNIE LI <annie.li@oracle.com>
Cc: 'Steven Haigh' <netwiz@crc.id.au>, "Palagummi,
	Siva" <Siva.Palagummi@ca.com>, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>, "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>, Sander Eikelenboom <linux@eikelenboom.it>, "msw@amazon.com" <msw@amazon.com>, Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>, Jacek Milewicz <jacekowski@jacekowski.org>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On Sun, 2013-03-10 at 05:22 +0000, ANNIE LI wrote:
> It is likely that coalescing work in netback you mentioned in thread(Is: 
> SKB_MAX_LEN bites again. Was: Re: bug disabling guest interface) is not 
> enough for some extremely large packets. So I assume the segment work in 
> netfront is also necessary.

I expect so too, although the segmentation thing seems like it is lower
priority, at least right now.

Ian.