From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scheduler: convert BUG_ON()s in try_to_wake_up_local() to WARN_ON_ONCE()s
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 07:29:54 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1363692594.5938.14.camel@gandalf.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1363688074.22553.14.camel@laptop>
On Tue, 2013-03-19 at 11:14 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-03-18 at 12:22 -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > try_to_wake_up_local() should only be invoked to wake up another task
> > in the same runqueue and BUG_ON()s are used to enforce the rule.
> > Missing try_to_wake_up_local() can stall workqueue execution but such
> > stalls are likely to be finite either by another work item being
> > queued or the one blocked getting unblocked. There's no reason to
> > trigger BUG while holding rq lock crashing the whole system.
> >
> > Convert BUG_ON()s in try_to_wake_up_local() to WARN_ON_ONCE()s.
>
> Doesn't really matter either way, the printk()s triggered by either
> will very likely kill the system anyhow ;-)
Only if something blocks on the console lock, and it tries to wake it
up. But even then, it has to be a reverse rq locking order, or wakeup on
the same rq that its running on (which is very unlikely).
I admit that it doesn't "solve" the bug. But at least there's a chance
to investigate what happened when the bug does occur. Right now we have
only one conclusion when the bug triggers, and that's a hard lockup.
-- Steve
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-19 11:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-18 19:22 Tejun Heo
2013-03-18 19:32 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-03-19 10:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-03-19 11:29 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2013-03-21 18:14 ` [tip:sched/urgent] sched: Convert BUG_ON() s " tip-bot for Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1363692594.5938.14.camel@gandalf.local.home \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--subject='Re: [PATCH] scheduler: convert BUG_ON()s in try_to_wake_up_local() to WARN_ON_ONCE()s' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.