* [PATCH 1/3] kernel/srcu: merge common code into a macro
@ 2013-03-19 14:16 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-03-19 14:16 ` [PATCH 2/3] kernel/SRCU: provide a static initializer Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior @ 2013-03-19 14:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paul E. McKenney
Cc: Lai Jiangshan, linux-kernel, tglx, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
DEFINE_SRCU() and DEFINE_STATIC_SRCU() does the same thing except for
the "static" attribute. This patch moves the common pieces into
_DEFINE_SRCU() which is used by the the former macros either adding the
static attribute or not.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
---
include/linux/srcu.h | 10 +++++-----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/srcu.h b/include/linux/srcu.h
index 6eb691b..d04acb8 100644
--- a/include/linux/srcu.h
+++ b/include/linux/srcu.h
@@ -102,13 +102,13 @@ void process_srcu(struct work_struct *work);
* define and init a srcu struct at build time.
* dont't call init_srcu_struct() nor cleanup_srcu_struct() on it.
*/
-#define DEFINE_SRCU(name) \
+#define _DEFINE_SRCU(name, mod) \
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct srcu_struct_array, name##_srcu_array);\
- struct srcu_struct name = __SRCU_STRUCT_INIT(name);
+ mod struct srcu_struct name = \
+ __SRCU_STRUCT_INIT(name);
-#define DEFINE_STATIC_SRCU(name) \
- static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct srcu_struct_array, name##_srcu_array);\
- static struct srcu_struct name = __SRCU_STRUCT_INIT(name);
+#define DEFINE_SRCU(name) _DEFINE_SRCU(name, )
+#define DEFINE_STATIC_SRCU(name) _DEFINE_SRCU(name, static)
/**
* call_srcu() - Queue a callback for invocation after an SRCU grace period
--
1.7.10.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/3] kernel/SRCU: provide a static initializer
2013-03-19 14:16 [PATCH 1/3] kernel/srcu: merge common code into a macro Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
@ 2013-03-19 14:16 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-04-05 7:21 ` Lai Jiangshan
2013-03-19 14:16 ` [PATCH 3/3] cpufreq: use static initializer for the SRCU notifier Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior @ 2013-03-19 14:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paul E. McKenney
Cc: Lai Jiangshan, linux-kernel, tglx, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
There are macros for static initializer for the three out of four
possible notifier types, that are:
ATOMIC_NOTIFIER_HEAD()
BLOCKING_NOTIFIER_HEAD()
RAW_NOTIFIER_HEAD()
This patch provides a static initilizer for the forth type to make it
complete.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
---
include/linux/notifier.h | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++-----
include/linux/srcu.h | 6 +++---
2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/notifier.h b/include/linux/notifier.h
index d65746e..6bfd703 100644
--- a/include/linux/notifier.h
+++ b/include/linux/notifier.h
@@ -42,9 +42,7 @@
* in srcu_notifier_call_chain(): no cache bounces and no memory barriers.
* As compensation, srcu_notifier_chain_unregister() is rather expensive.
* SRCU notifier chains should be used when the chain will be called very
- * often but notifier_blocks will seldom be removed. Also, SRCU notifier
- * chains are slightly more difficult to use because they require special
- * runtime initialization.
+ * often but notifier_blocks will seldom be removed.
*/
struct notifier_block {
@@ -85,7 +83,7 @@ struct srcu_notifier_head {
(name)->head = NULL; \
} while (0)
-/* srcu_notifier_heads must be initialized and cleaned up dynamically */
+/* srcu_notifier_heads must be cleaned up dynamically */
extern void srcu_init_notifier_head(struct srcu_notifier_head *nh);
#define srcu_cleanup_notifier_head(name) \
cleanup_srcu_struct(&(name)->srcu);
@@ -98,7 +96,13 @@ extern void srcu_init_notifier_head(struct srcu_notifier_head *nh);
.head = NULL }
#define RAW_NOTIFIER_INIT(name) { \
.head = NULL }
-/* srcu_notifier_heads cannot be initialized statically */
+
+#define SRCU_NOTIFIER_INIT(name, pcpu) \
+ { \
+ .mutex = __MUTEX_INITIALIZER(name.mutex), \
+ .head = NULL, \
+ .srcu = __SRCU_STRUCT_INIT(name.srcu, pcpu), \
+ }
#define ATOMIC_NOTIFIER_HEAD(name) \
struct atomic_notifier_head name = \
@@ -110,6 +114,18 @@ extern void srcu_init_notifier_head(struct srcu_notifier_head *nh);
struct raw_notifier_head name = \
RAW_NOTIFIER_INIT(name)
+#define _SRCU_NOTIFIER_HEAD(name, mod) \
+ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct srcu_struct_array, \
+ name##_head_srcu_array); \
+ mod struct srcu_notifier_head name = \
+ SRCU_NOTIFIER_INIT(name, name##_head_srcu_array)
+
+#define SRCU_NOTIFIER_HEAD(name) \
+ _SRCU_NOTIFIER_HEAD(name, )
+
+#define SRCU_NOTIFIER_HEAD_STATIC(name) \
+ _SRCU_NOTIFIER_HEAD(name, static)
+
#ifdef __KERNEL__
extern int atomic_notifier_chain_register(struct atomic_notifier_head *nh,
diff --git a/include/linux/srcu.h b/include/linux/srcu.h
index d04acb8..fe9efd4 100644
--- a/include/linux/srcu.h
+++ b/include/linux/srcu.h
@@ -84,10 +84,10 @@ int init_srcu_struct(struct srcu_struct *sp);
void process_srcu(struct work_struct *work);
-#define __SRCU_STRUCT_INIT(name) \
+#define __SRCU_STRUCT_INIT(name, pcpu_name) \
{ \
.completed = -300, \
- .per_cpu_ref = &name##_srcu_array, \
+ .per_cpu_ref = &pcpu_name, \
.queue_lock = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(name.queue_lock), \
.running = false, \
.batch_queue = RCU_BATCH_INIT(name.batch_queue), \
@@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ void process_srcu(struct work_struct *work);
#define _DEFINE_SRCU(name, mod) \
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct srcu_struct_array, name##_srcu_array);\
mod struct srcu_struct name = \
- __SRCU_STRUCT_INIT(name);
+ __SRCU_STRUCT_INIT(name, name##_srcu_array);
#define DEFINE_SRCU(name) _DEFINE_SRCU(name, )
#define DEFINE_STATIC_SRCU(name) _DEFINE_SRCU(name, static)
--
1.7.10.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 3/3] cpufreq: use static initializer for the SRCU notifier
2013-03-19 14:16 [PATCH 1/3] kernel/srcu: merge common code into a macro Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-03-19 14:16 ` [PATCH 2/3] kernel/SRCU: provide a static initializer Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
@ 2013-03-19 14:16 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-03-19 16:22 ` [PATCH 1/3] kernel/srcu: merge common code into a macro Joe Perches
2013-04-05 7:21 ` Lai Jiangshan
3 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior @ 2013-03-19 14:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paul E. McKenney
Cc: Lai Jiangshan, linux-kernel, tglx, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
---
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index 1f93dbd..cd5acda 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -117,12 +117,11 @@ static void handle_update(struct work_struct *work);
* The mutex locks both lists.
*/
static BLOCKING_NOTIFIER_HEAD(cpufreq_policy_notifier_list);
-static struct srcu_notifier_head cpufreq_transition_notifier_list;
+SRCU_NOTIFIER_HEAD_STATIC(cpufreq_transition_notifier_list);
static bool init_cpufreq_transition_notifier_list_called;
static int __init init_cpufreq_transition_notifier_list(void)
{
- srcu_init_notifier_head(&cpufreq_transition_notifier_list);
init_cpufreq_transition_notifier_list_called = true;
return 0;
}
--
1.7.10.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/3] kernel/srcu: merge common code into a macro
2013-03-19 14:16 [PATCH 1/3] kernel/srcu: merge common code into a macro Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-03-19 14:16 ` [PATCH 2/3] kernel/SRCU: provide a static initializer Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-03-19 14:16 ` [PATCH 3/3] cpufreq: use static initializer for the SRCU notifier Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
@ 2013-03-19 16:22 ` Joe Perches
2013-03-19 18:15 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-04-05 7:21 ` Lai Jiangshan
3 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Joe Perches @ 2013-03-19 16:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Cc: Paul E. McKenney, Lai Jiangshan, linux-kernel, tglx
On Tue, 2013-03-19 at 15:16 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> DEFINE_SRCU() and DEFINE_STATIC_SRCU() does the same thing except for
> the "static" attribute. This patch moves the common pieces into
> _DEFINE_SRCU() which is used by the the former macros either adding the
> static attribute or not.
[]
> diff --git a/include/linux/srcu.h b/include/linux/srcu.h
[]
> +#define DEFINE_SRCU(name) _DEFINE_SRCU(name, )
> +#define DEFINE_STATIC_SRCU(name) _DEFINE_SRCU(name, static)
I think the use of an empty argument, even in
a macro, unsightly.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/3] kernel/srcu: merge common code into a macro
2013-03-19 16:22 ` [PATCH 1/3] kernel/srcu: merge common code into a macro Joe Perches
@ 2013-03-19 18:15 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior @ 2013-03-19 18:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joe Perches; +Cc: Paul E. McKenney, Lai Jiangshan, linux-kernel, tglx
On 03/19/2013 05:22 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
>> +#define DEFINE_SRCU(name) _DEFINE_SRCU(name, )
>> +#define DEFINE_STATIC_SRCU(name) _DEFINE_SRCU(name, static)
>
> I think the use of an empty argument, even in
> a macro, unsightly.
__wait_event_lock_irq() => __wait_event_lock_irq() is a prominent user.
I would prefer to avoid adding something like /* nothing */.
Sebastian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/3] kernel/srcu: merge common code into a macro
2013-03-19 14:16 [PATCH 1/3] kernel/srcu: merge common code into a macro Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2013-03-19 16:22 ` [PATCH 1/3] kernel/srcu: merge common code into a macro Joe Perches
@ 2013-04-05 7:21 ` Lai Jiangshan
2013-04-08 10:05 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
3 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Lai Jiangshan @ 2013-04-05 7:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior; +Cc: Paul E. McKenney, linux-kernel, tglx
On 03/19/2013 10:16 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> DEFINE_SRCU() and DEFINE_STATIC_SRCU() does the same thing except for
> the "static" attribute. This patch moves the common pieces into
> _DEFINE_SRCU() which is used by the the former macros either adding the
> static attribute or not.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
> ---
> include/linux/srcu.h | 10 +++++-----
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Hi, Sebastian
The patch hurts readability.
The original code are simple enough, merging them as one macro
gives us no benefit.
Thanks
Lai.
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/srcu.h b/include/linux/srcu.h
> index 6eb691b..d04acb8 100644
> --- a/include/linux/srcu.h
> +++ b/include/linux/srcu.h
> @@ -102,13 +102,13 @@ void process_srcu(struct work_struct *work);
> * define and init a srcu struct at build time.
> * dont't call init_srcu_struct() nor cleanup_srcu_struct() on it.
> */
> -#define DEFINE_SRCU(name) \
> +#define _DEFINE_SRCU(name, mod) \
> static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct srcu_struct_array, name##_srcu_array);\
> - struct srcu_struct name = __SRCU_STRUCT_INIT(name);
> + mod struct srcu_struct name = \
> + __SRCU_STRUCT_INIT(name);
>
> -#define DEFINE_STATIC_SRCU(name) \
> - static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct srcu_struct_array, name##_srcu_array);\
> - static struct srcu_struct name = __SRCU_STRUCT_INIT(name);
> +#define DEFINE_SRCU(name) _DEFINE_SRCU(name, )
> +#define DEFINE_STATIC_SRCU(name) _DEFINE_SRCU(name, static)
>
> /**
> * call_srcu() - Queue a callback for invocation after an SRCU grace period
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/3] kernel/SRCU: provide a static initializer
2013-03-19 14:16 ` [PATCH 2/3] kernel/SRCU: provide a static initializer Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
@ 2013-04-05 7:21 ` Lai Jiangshan
2013-04-08 10:03 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Lai Jiangshan @ 2013-04-05 7:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior; +Cc: Paul E. McKenney, linux-kernel, tglx
On 03/19/2013 10:16 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> There are macros for static initializer for the three out of four
> possible notifier types, that are:
> ATOMIC_NOTIFIER_HEAD()
> BLOCKING_NOTIFIER_HEAD()
> RAW_NOTIFIER_HEAD()
>
> This patch provides a static initilizer for the forth type to make it
> complete.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
> ---
> include/linux/notifier.h | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++-----
> include/linux/srcu.h | 6 +++---
> 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/notifier.h b/include/linux/notifier.h
> index d65746e..6bfd703 100644
> --- a/include/linux/notifier.h
> +++ b/include/linux/notifier.h
> @@ -42,9 +42,7 @@
> * in srcu_notifier_call_chain(): no cache bounces and no memory barriers.
> * As compensation, srcu_notifier_chain_unregister() is rather expensive.
> * SRCU notifier chains should be used when the chain will be called very
> - * often but notifier_blocks will seldom be removed. Also, SRCU notifier
> - * chains are slightly more difficult to use because they require special
> - * runtime initialization.
> + * often but notifier_blocks will seldom be removed.
> */
>
> struct notifier_block {
> @@ -85,7 +83,7 @@ struct srcu_notifier_head {
> (name)->head = NULL; \
> } while (0)
>
> -/* srcu_notifier_heads must be initialized and cleaned up dynamically */
> +/* srcu_notifier_heads must be cleaned up dynamically */
> extern void srcu_init_notifier_head(struct srcu_notifier_head *nh);
> #define srcu_cleanup_notifier_head(name) \
> cleanup_srcu_struct(&(name)->srcu);
> @@ -98,7 +96,13 @@ extern void srcu_init_notifier_head(struct srcu_notifier_head *nh);
> .head = NULL }
> #define RAW_NOTIFIER_INIT(name) { \
> .head = NULL }
> -/* srcu_notifier_heads cannot be initialized statically */
> +
> +#define SRCU_NOTIFIER_INIT(name, pcpu) \
> + { \
> + .mutex = __MUTEX_INITIALIZER(name.mutex), \
> + .head = NULL, \
> + .srcu = __SRCU_STRUCT_INIT(name.srcu, pcpu), \
> + }
Hi, Sebastian
I don't want to expose __SRCU_STRUCT_INIT(),
due to it has strong coupling with the percpu array.
I hope other structure which uses SRCU should use init_srcu_struct().
Thanks,
Lai
>
> #define ATOMIC_NOTIFIER_HEAD(name) \
> struct atomic_notifier_head name = \
> @@ -110,6 +114,18 @@ extern void srcu_init_notifier_head(struct srcu_notifier_head *nh);
> struct raw_notifier_head name = \
> RAW_NOTIFIER_INIT(name)
>
> +#define _SRCU_NOTIFIER_HEAD(name, mod) \
> + static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct srcu_struct_array, \
> + name##_head_srcu_array); \
> + mod struct srcu_notifier_head name = \
> + SRCU_NOTIFIER_INIT(name, name##_head_srcu_array)
> +
> +#define SRCU_NOTIFIER_HEAD(name) \
> + _SRCU_NOTIFIER_HEAD(name, )
> +
> +#define SRCU_NOTIFIER_HEAD_STATIC(name) \
> + _SRCU_NOTIFIER_HEAD(name, static)
> +
> #ifdef __KERNEL__
>
> extern int atomic_notifier_chain_register(struct atomic_notifier_head *nh,
> diff --git a/include/linux/srcu.h b/include/linux/srcu.h
> index d04acb8..fe9efd4 100644
> --- a/include/linux/srcu.h
> +++ b/include/linux/srcu.h
> @@ -84,10 +84,10 @@ int init_srcu_struct(struct srcu_struct *sp);
>
> void process_srcu(struct work_struct *work);
>
> -#define __SRCU_STRUCT_INIT(name) \
> +#define __SRCU_STRUCT_INIT(name, pcpu_name) \
> { \
> .completed = -300, \
> - .per_cpu_ref = &name##_srcu_array, \
> + .per_cpu_ref = &pcpu_name, \
> .queue_lock = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(name.queue_lock), \
> .running = false, \
> .batch_queue = RCU_BATCH_INIT(name.batch_queue), \
> @@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ void process_srcu(struct work_struct *work);
> #define _DEFINE_SRCU(name, mod) \
> static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct srcu_struct_array, name##_srcu_array);\
> mod struct srcu_struct name = \
> - __SRCU_STRUCT_INIT(name);
> + __SRCU_STRUCT_INIT(name, name##_srcu_array);
>
> #define DEFINE_SRCU(name) _DEFINE_SRCU(name, )
> #define DEFINE_STATIC_SRCU(name) _DEFINE_SRCU(name, static)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/3] kernel/SRCU: provide a static initializer
2013-04-05 7:21 ` Lai Jiangshan
@ 2013-04-08 10:03 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-04-09 1:09 ` Lai Jiangshan
0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior @ 2013-04-08 10:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lai Jiangshan; +Cc: Paul E. McKenney, linux-kernel, tglx
On 04/05/2013 09:21 AM, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> Hi, Sebastian
Hi Lai,
> I don't want to expose __SRCU_STRUCT_INIT(),
> due to it has strong coupling with the percpu array.
>
> I hope other structure which uses SRCU should use init_srcu_struct().
I need a static initialization for this kind. Patch #3 shows one
example I have another one pending for crypto.
Do you have any idea how I could get it done without this? Do you want
to move/merge header files?
>
> Thanks,
> Lai
Sebastian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/3] kernel/srcu: merge common code into a macro
2013-04-05 7:21 ` Lai Jiangshan
@ 2013-04-08 10:05 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior @ 2013-04-08 10:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lai Jiangshan; +Cc: Paul E. McKenney, linux-kernel, tglx
On 04/05/2013 09:21 AM, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> Hi, Sebastian
Hi Lai,
> The patch hurts readability.
> The original code are simple enough, merging them as one macro
> gives us no benefit.
Except when you need to adjust the macro and you have to touch both of
them instead just one. But I don't have strong feelings for that one.
> Thanks
> Lai.
Sebastian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/3] kernel/SRCU: provide a static initializer
2013-04-08 10:03 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
@ 2013-04-09 1:09 ` Lai Jiangshan
2013-04-11 17:04 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Lai Jiangshan @ 2013-04-09 1:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior; +Cc: Paul E. McKenney, linux-kernel, tglx
On 04/08/2013 06:03 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 04/05/2013 09:21 AM, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
>> Hi, Sebastian
>
> Hi Lai,
>
>> I don't want to expose __SRCU_STRUCT_INIT(),
>> due to it has strong coupling with the percpu array.
>>
>> I hope other structure which uses SRCU should use init_srcu_struct().
>
> I need a static initialization for this kind. Patch #3 shows one
> example I have another one pending for crypto.
If the percpu array can be defined in __SRCU_STRUCT_INIT(),
I'm happy to expose it. but it is not currently.
Why crypto can't use boot time initialization?
> Do you have any idea how I could get it done without this? Do you want
> to move/merge header files?
if crypto has to use static initialization, I will find out some way
or use your patch.
Thanks,
Lai
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Lai
>
> Sebastian
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/3] kernel/SRCU: provide a static initializer
2013-04-09 1:09 ` Lai Jiangshan
@ 2013-04-11 17:04 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-04-12 2:56 ` Lai Jiangshan
0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior @ 2013-04-11 17:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lai Jiangshan
Cc: Paul E. McKenney, linux-kernel, tglx, Peter Zijlstra, Herbert Xu
* Lai Jiangshan | 2013-04-09 09:09:56 [+0800]:
>If the percpu array can be defined in __SRCU_STRUCT_INIT(),
>I'm happy to expose it. but it is not currently.
I have no idea how to achieve this.
>Why crypto can't use boot time initialization?
It would require something like this:
--- linux-stable.orig/crypto/Kconfig
+++ linux-stable/crypto/Kconfig
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ source "crypto/async_tx/Kconfig"
# Cryptographic API Configuration
#
menuconfig CRYPTO
- tristate "Cryptographic API"
+ bool "Cryptographic API"
help
This option provides the core Cryptographic API.
--- linux-stable.orig/crypto/api.c
+++ linux-stable/crypto/api.c
@@ -34,6 +34,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(crypto_alg_sem);
struct srcu_notifier_head crypto_chain;
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(crypto_chain);
+static int __init crypto_api_init(void)
+{
+ srcu_init_notifier_head(&crypto_chain);
+ return 0;
+}
+core_initcall(crypto_api_init);
+
static inline struct crypto_alg *crypto_alg_get(struct crypto_alg *alg)
{
atomic_inc(&alg->cra_refcnt);
and there is no need for this.
>> Do you have any idea how I could get it done without this? Do you want
>> to move/merge header files?
>
>if crypto has to use static initialization, I will find out some way
>or use your patch.
The crypto would like this:
Subject: crypto: Convert crypto notifier chain to SRCU
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2012 09:03:24 +0100
The crypto notifier deadlocks on RT. Though this can be a real deadlock
on mainline as well due to fifo fair rwsems.
The involved parties here are:
[ 82.172678] swapper/0 S 0000000000000001 0 1 0 0x00000000
[ 82.172682] ffff88042f18fcf0 0000000000000046 ffff88042f18fc80 ffffffff81491238
[ 82.172685] 0000000000011cc0 0000000000011cc0 ffff88042f18c040 ffff88042f18ffd8
[ 82.172688] 0000000000011cc0 0000000000011cc0 ffff88042f18ffd8 0000000000011cc0
[ 82.172689] Call Trace:
[ 82.172697] [<ffffffff81491238>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x6c/0x7a
[ 82.172701] [<ffffffff8148fd3f>] schedule+0x64/0x66
[ 82.172704] [<ffffffff8148ec6b>] schedule_timeout+0x27/0xd0
[ 82.172708] [<ffffffff81043c0c>] ? unpin_current_cpu+0x1a/0x6c
[ 82.172713] [<ffffffff8106e491>] ? migrate_enable+0x12f/0x141
[ 82.172716] [<ffffffff8148fbbd>] wait_for_common+0xbb/0x11f
[ 82.172719] [<ffffffff810709f2>] ? try_to_wake_up+0x182/0x182
[ 82.172722] [<ffffffff8148fc96>] wait_for_completion_interruptible+0x1d/0x2e
[ 82.172726] [<ffffffff811debfd>] crypto_wait_for_test+0x49/0x6b
[ 82.172728] [<ffffffff811ded32>] crypto_register_alg+0x53/0x5a
[ 82.172730] [<ffffffff811ded6c>] crypto_register_algs+0x33/0x72
[ 82.172734] [<ffffffff81ad7686>] ? aes_init+0x12/0x12
[ 82.172737] [<ffffffff81ad76ea>] aesni_init+0x64/0x66
[ 82.172741] [<ffffffff81000318>] do_one_initcall+0x7f/0x13b
[ 82.172744] [<ffffffff81ac4d34>] kernel_init+0x199/0x22c
[ 82.172747] [<ffffffff81ac44ef>] ? loglevel+0x31/0x31
[ 82.172752] [<ffffffff814987c4>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
[ 82.172755] [<ffffffff81491574>] ? retint_restore_args+0x13/0x13
[ 82.172759] [<ffffffff81ac4b9b>] ? start_kernel+0x3ca/0x3ca
[ 82.172761] [<ffffffff814987c0>] ? gs_change+0x13/0x13
[ 82.174186] cryptomgr_test S 0000000000000001 0 41 2 0x00000000
[ 82.174189] ffff88042c971980 0000000000000046 ffffffff81d74830 0000000000000292
[ 82.174192] 0000000000011cc0 0000000000011cc0 ffff88042c96eb80 ffff88042c971fd8
[ 82.174195] 0000000000011cc0 0000000000011cc0 ffff88042c971fd8 0000000000011cc0
[ 82.174195] Call Trace:
[ 82.174198] [<ffffffff8148fd3f>] schedule+0x64/0x66
[ 82.174201] [<ffffffff8148ec6b>] schedule_timeout+0x27/0xd0
[ 82.174204] [<ffffffff81043c0c>] ? unpin_current_cpu+0x1a/0x6c
[ 82.174206] [<ffffffff8106e491>] ? migrate_enable+0x12f/0x141
[ 82.174209] [<ffffffff8148fbbd>] wait_for_common+0xbb/0x11f
[ 82.174212] [<ffffffff810709f2>] ? try_to_wake_up+0x182/0x182
[ 82.174215] [<ffffffff8148fc96>] wait_for_completion_interruptible+0x1d/0x2e
[ 82.174218] [<ffffffff811e4883>] cryptomgr_notify+0x280/0x385
[ 82.174221] [<ffffffff814943de>] notifier_call_chain+0x6b/0x98
[ 82.174224] [<ffffffff8108a11c>] ? rt_down_read+0x10/0x12
[ 82.174227] [<ffffffff810677cd>] __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x70/0x8d
[ 82.174230] [<ffffffff810677fe>] blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x14/0x16
[ 82.174234] [<ffffffff811dd272>] crypto_probing_notify+0x24/0x50
[ 82.174236] [<ffffffff811dd7a1>] crypto_alg_mod_lookup+0x3e/0x74
[ 82.174238] [<ffffffff811dd949>] crypto_alloc_base+0x36/0x8f
[ 82.174241] [<ffffffff811e9408>] cryptd_alloc_ablkcipher+0x6e/0xb5
[ 82.174243] [<ffffffff811dd591>] ? kzalloc.clone.5+0xe/0x10
[ 82.174246] [<ffffffff8103085d>] ablk_init_common+0x1d/0x38
[ 82.174249] [<ffffffff8103852a>] ablk_ecb_init+0x15/0x17
[ 82.174251] [<ffffffff811dd8c6>] __crypto_alloc_tfm+0xc7/0x114
[ 82.174254] [<ffffffff811e0caa>] ? crypto_lookup_skcipher+0x1f/0xe4
[ 82.174256] [<ffffffff811e0dcf>] crypto_alloc_ablkcipher+0x60/0xa5
[ 82.174258] [<ffffffff811e5bde>] alg_test_skcipher+0x24/0x9b
[ 82.174261] [<ffffffff8106d96d>] ? finish_task_switch+0x3f/0xfa
[ 82.174263] [<ffffffff811e6b8e>] alg_test+0x16f/0x1d7
[ 82.174267] [<ffffffff811e45ac>] ? cryptomgr_probe+0xac/0xac
[ 82.174269] [<ffffffff811e45d8>] cryptomgr_test+0x2c/0x47
[ 82.174272] [<ffffffff81061161>] kthread+0x7e/0x86
[ 82.174275] [<ffffffff8106d9dd>] ? finish_task_switch+0xaf/0xfa
[ 82.174278] [<ffffffff814987c4>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
[ 82.174281] [<ffffffff81491574>] ? retint_restore_args+0x13/0x13
[ 82.174284] [<ffffffff810610e3>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x8c/0x8c
[ 82.174287] [<ffffffff814987c0>] ? gs_change+0x13/0x13
[ 82.174329] cryptomgr_probe D 0000000000000002 0 47 2 0x00000000
[ 82.174332] ffff88042c991b70 0000000000000046 ffff88042c991bb0 0000000000000006
[ 82.174335] 0000000000011cc0 0000000000011cc0 ffff88042c98ed00 ffff88042c991fd8
[ 82.174338] 0000000000011cc0 0000000000011cc0 ffff88042c991fd8 0000000000011cc0
[ 82.174338] Call Trace:
[ 82.174342] [<ffffffff8148fd3f>] schedule+0x64/0x66
[ 82.174344] [<ffffffff814901ad>] __rt_mutex_slowlock+0x85/0xbe
[ 82.174347] [<ffffffff814902d2>] rt_mutex_slowlock+0xec/0x159
[ 82.174351] [<ffffffff81089c4d>] rt_mutex_fastlock.clone.8+0x29/0x2f
[ 82.174353] [<ffffffff81490372>] rt_mutex_lock+0x33/0x37
[ 82.174356] [<ffffffff8108a0f2>] __rt_down_read+0x50/0x5a
[ 82.174358] [<ffffffff8108a11c>] ? rt_down_read+0x10/0x12
[ 82.174360] [<ffffffff8108a11c>] rt_down_read+0x10/0x12
[ 82.174363] [<ffffffff810677b5>] __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x58/0x8d
[ 82.174366] [<ffffffff810677fe>] blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x14/0x16
[ 82.174369] [<ffffffff811dd272>] crypto_probing_notify+0x24/0x50
[ 82.174372] [<ffffffff811debd6>] crypto_wait_for_test+0x22/0x6b
[ 82.174374] [<ffffffff811decd3>] crypto_register_instance+0xb4/0xc0
[ 82.174377] [<ffffffff811e9b76>] cryptd_create+0x378/0x3b6
[ 82.174379] [<ffffffff811de512>] ? __crypto_lookup_template+0x5b/0x63
[ 82.174382] [<ffffffff811e4545>] cryptomgr_probe+0x45/0xac
[ 82.174385] [<ffffffff811e4500>] ? crypto_alloc_pcomp+0x1b/0x1b
[ 82.174388] [<ffffffff81061161>] kthread+0x7e/0x86
[ 82.174391] [<ffffffff8106d9dd>] ? finish_task_switch+0xaf/0xfa
[ 82.174394] [<ffffffff814987c4>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
[ 82.174398] [<ffffffff81491574>] ? retint_restore_args+0x13/0x13
[ 82.174401] [<ffffffff810610e3>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x8c/0x8c
[ 82.174403] [<ffffffff814987c0>] ? gs_change+0x13/0x13
cryptomgr_test spawns the cryptomgr_probe thread from the notifier
call. The probe thread fires the same notifier as the test thread and
deadlocks on the rwsem on RT.
Now this is a potential deadlock in mainline as well, because we have
fifo fair rwsems. If another thread blocks with a down_write() on the
notifier chain before the probe thread issues the down_read() it will
block the probe thread and the whole party is dead locked.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
---
crypto/algapi.c | 4 ++--
crypto/api.c | 6 +++---
crypto/internal.h | 4 ++--
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
--- a/crypto/algapi.c
+++ b/crypto/algapi.c
@@ -683,13 +683,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(crypto_spawn_tfm2);
int crypto_register_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb)
{
- return blocking_notifier_chain_register(&crypto_chain, nb);
+ return srcu_notifier_chain_register(&crypto_chain, nb);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(crypto_register_notifier);
int crypto_unregister_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb)
{
- return blocking_notifier_chain_unregister(&crypto_chain, nb);
+ return srcu_notifier_chain_unregister(&crypto_chain, nb);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(crypto_unregister_notifier);
--- a/crypto/api.c
+++ b/crypto/api.c
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(crypto_alg_list);
DECLARE_RWSEM(crypto_alg_sem);
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(crypto_alg_sem);
-BLOCKING_NOTIFIER_HEAD(crypto_chain);
+SRCU_NOTIFIER_HEAD(crypto_chain);
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(crypto_chain);
static inline struct crypto_alg *crypto_alg_get(struct crypto_alg *alg)
@@ -237,10 +237,10 @@ int crypto_probing_notify(unsigned long
{
int ok;
- ok = blocking_notifier_call_chain(&crypto_chain, val, v);
+ ok = srcu_notifier_call_chain(&crypto_chain, val, v);
if (ok == NOTIFY_DONE) {
request_module("cryptomgr");
- ok = blocking_notifier_call_chain(&crypto_chain, val, v);
+ ok = srcu_notifier_call_chain(&crypto_chain, val, v);
}
return ok;
--- a/crypto/internal.h
+++ b/crypto/internal.h
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ struct crypto_larval {
extern struct list_head crypto_alg_list;
extern struct rw_semaphore crypto_alg_sem;
-extern struct blocking_notifier_head crypto_chain;
+extern struct srcu_notifier_head crypto_chain;
#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
void __init crypto_init_proc(void);
@@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ static inline int crypto_is_moribund(str
static inline void crypto_notify(unsigned long val, void *v)
{
- blocking_notifier_call_chain(&crypto_chain, val, v);
+ srcu_notifier_call_chain(&crypto_chain, val, v);
}
#endif /* _CRYPTO_INTERNAL_H */
>Thanks,
>Lai
Sebastian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/3] kernel/SRCU: provide a static initializer
2013-04-11 17:04 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
@ 2013-04-12 2:56 ` Lai Jiangshan
2013-04-16 18:20 ` Paul E. McKenney
0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Lai Jiangshan @ 2013-04-12 2:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Cc: Paul E. McKenney, linux-kernel, tglx, Peter Zijlstra, Herbert Xu
On 04/12/2013 01:04 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> * Lai Jiangshan | 2013-04-09 09:09:56 [+0800]:
>
>> If the percpu array can be defined in __SRCU_STRUCT_INIT(),
>> I'm happy to expose it. but it is not currently.
>
> I have no idea how to achieve this.
>
>> Why crypto can't use boot time initialization?
>
> It would require something like this:
> --- linux-stable.orig/crypto/Kconfig
> +++ linux-stable/crypto/Kconfig
> @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ source "crypto/async_tx/Kconfig"
> # Cryptographic API Configuration
> #
> menuconfig CRYPTO
> - tristate "Cryptographic API"
> + bool "Cryptographic API"
> help
> This option provides the core Cryptographic API.
Why convert to "bool"?
srcu_init_notifier_head() can be called in module-load-time.
>
> --- linux-stable.orig/crypto/api.c
> +++ linux-stable/crypto/api.c
> @@ -34,6 +34,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(crypto_alg_sem);
> struct srcu_notifier_head crypto_chain;
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(crypto_chain);
>
> +static int __init crypto_api_init(void)
> +{
> + srcu_init_notifier_head(&crypto_chain);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +core_initcall(crypto_api_init);
> +
> static inline struct crypto_alg *crypto_alg_get(struct crypto_alg *alg)
> {
> atomic_inc(&alg->cra_refcnt);
And again, why crypto can't use boot time nor module-load-time initialization?
>
> and there is no need for this.
>
>>> Do you have any idea how I could get it done without this? Do you want
>>> to move/merge header files?
>>
>> if crypto has to use static initialization, I will find out some way
>> or use your patch.
>
> The crypto would like this:
>
> Subject: crypto: Convert crypto notifier chain to SRCU
> From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2012 09:03:24 +0100
>
> The crypto notifier deadlocks on RT. Though this can be a real deadlock
> on mainline as well due to fifo fair rwsems.
>
> The involved parties here are:
>
> [ 82.172678] swapper/0 S 0000000000000001 0 1 0 0x00000000
> [ 82.172682] ffff88042f18fcf0 0000000000000046 ffff88042f18fc80 ffffffff81491238
> [ 82.172685] 0000000000011cc0 0000000000011cc0 ffff88042f18c040 ffff88042f18ffd8
> [ 82.172688] 0000000000011cc0 0000000000011cc0 ffff88042f18ffd8 0000000000011cc0
> [ 82.172689] Call Trace:
> [ 82.172697] [<ffffffff81491238>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x6c/0x7a
> [ 82.172701] [<ffffffff8148fd3f>] schedule+0x64/0x66
> [ 82.172704] [<ffffffff8148ec6b>] schedule_timeout+0x27/0xd0
> [ 82.172708] [<ffffffff81043c0c>] ? unpin_current_cpu+0x1a/0x6c
> [ 82.172713] [<ffffffff8106e491>] ? migrate_enable+0x12f/0x141
> [ 82.172716] [<ffffffff8148fbbd>] wait_for_common+0xbb/0x11f
> [ 82.172719] [<ffffffff810709f2>] ? try_to_wake_up+0x182/0x182
> [ 82.172722] [<ffffffff8148fc96>] wait_for_completion_interruptible+0x1d/0x2e
> [ 82.172726] [<ffffffff811debfd>] crypto_wait_for_test+0x49/0x6b
> [ 82.172728] [<ffffffff811ded32>] crypto_register_alg+0x53/0x5a
> [ 82.172730] [<ffffffff811ded6c>] crypto_register_algs+0x33/0x72
> [ 82.172734] [<ffffffff81ad7686>] ? aes_init+0x12/0x12
> [ 82.172737] [<ffffffff81ad76ea>] aesni_init+0x64/0x66
> [ 82.172741] [<ffffffff81000318>] do_one_initcall+0x7f/0x13b
> [ 82.172744] [<ffffffff81ac4d34>] kernel_init+0x199/0x22c
> [ 82.172747] [<ffffffff81ac44ef>] ? loglevel+0x31/0x31
> [ 82.172752] [<ffffffff814987c4>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
> [ 82.172755] [<ffffffff81491574>] ? retint_restore_args+0x13/0x13
> [ 82.172759] [<ffffffff81ac4b9b>] ? start_kernel+0x3ca/0x3ca
> [ 82.172761] [<ffffffff814987c0>] ? gs_change+0x13/0x13
>
> [ 82.174186] cryptomgr_test S 0000000000000001 0 41 2 0x00000000
> [ 82.174189] ffff88042c971980 0000000000000046 ffffffff81d74830 0000000000000292
> [ 82.174192] 0000000000011cc0 0000000000011cc0 ffff88042c96eb80 ffff88042c971fd8
> [ 82.174195] 0000000000011cc0 0000000000011cc0 ffff88042c971fd8 0000000000011cc0
> [ 82.174195] Call Trace:
> [ 82.174198] [<ffffffff8148fd3f>] schedule+0x64/0x66
> [ 82.174201] [<ffffffff8148ec6b>] schedule_timeout+0x27/0xd0
> [ 82.174204] [<ffffffff81043c0c>] ? unpin_current_cpu+0x1a/0x6c
> [ 82.174206] [<ffffffff8106e491>] ? migrate_enable+0x12f/0x141
> [ 82.174209] [<ffffffff8148fbbd>] wait_for_common+0xbb/0x11f
> [ 82.174212] [<ffffffff810709f2>] ? try_to_wake_up+0x182/0x182
> [ 82.174215] [<ffffffff8148fc96>] wait_for_completion_interruptible+0x1d/0x2e
> [ 82.174218] [<ffffffff811e4883>] cryptomgr_notify+0x280/0x385
> [ 82.174221] [<ffffffff814943de>] notifier_call_chain+0x6b/0x98
> [ 82.174224] [<ffffffff8108a11c>] ? rt_down_read+0x10/0x12
> [ 82.174227] [<ffffffff810677cd>] __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x70/0x8d
> [ 82.174230] [<ffffffff810677fe>] blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x14/0x16
> [ 82.174234] [<ffffffff811dd272>] crypto_probing_notify+0x24/0x50
> [ 82.174236] [<ffffffff811dd7a1>] crypto_alg_mod_lookup+0x3e/0x74
> [ 82.174238] [<ffffffff811dd949>] crypto_alloc_base+0x36/0x8f
> [ 82.174241] [<ffffffff811e9408>] cryptd_alloc_ablkcipher+0x6e/0xb5
> [ 82.174243] [<ffffffff811dd591>] ? kzalloc.clone.5+0xe/0x10
> [ 82.174246] [<ffffffff8103085d>] ablk_init_common+0x1d/0x38
> [ 82.174249] [<ffffffff8103852a>] ablk_ecb_init+0x15/0x17
> [ 82.174251] [<ffffffff811dd8c6>] __crypto_alloc_tfm+0xc7/0x114
> [ 82.174254] [<ffffffff811e0caa>] ? crypto_lookup_skcipher+0x1f/0xe4
> [ 82.174256] [<ffffffff811e0dcf>] crypto_alloc_ablkcipher+0x60/0xa5
> [ 82.174258] [<ffffffff811e5bde>] alg_test_skcipher+0x24/0x9b
> [ 82.174261] [<ffffffff8106d96d>] ? finish_task_switch+0x3f/0xfa
> [ 82.174263] [<ffffffff811e6b8e>] alg_test+0x16f/0x1d7
> [ 82.174267] [<ffffffff811e45ac>] ? cryptomgr_probe+0xac/0xac
> [ 82.174269] [<ffffffff811e45d8>] cryptomgr_test+0x2c/0x47
> [ 82.174272] [<ffffffff81061161>] kthread+0x7e/0x86
> [ 82.174275] [<ffffffff8106d9dd>] ? finish_task_switch+0xaf/0xfa
> [ 82.174278] [<ffffffff814987c4>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
> [ 82.174281] [<ffffffff81491574>] ? retint_restore_args+0x13/0x13
> [ 82.174284] [<ffffffff810610e3>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x8c/0x8c
> [ 82.174287] [<ffffffff814987c0>] ? gs_change+0x13/0x13
>
> [ 82.174329] cryptomgr_probe D 0000000000000002 0 47 2 0x00000000
> [ 82.174332] ffff88042c991b70 0000000000000046 ffff88042c991bb0 0000000000000006
> [ 82.174335] 0000000000011cc0 0000000000011cc0 ffff88042c98ed00 ffff88042c991fd8
> [ 82.174338] 0000000000011cc0 0000000000011cc0 ffff88042c991fd8 0000000000011cc0
> [ 82.174338] Call Trace:
> [ 82.174342] [<ffffffff8148fd3f>] schedule+0x64/0x66
> [ 82.174344] [<ffffffff814901ad>] __rt_mutex_slowlock+0x85/0xbe
> [ 82.174347] [<ffffffff814902d2>] rt_mutex_slowlock+0xec/0x159
> [ 82.174351] [<ffffffff81089c4d>] rt_mutex_fastlock.clone.8+0x29/0x2f
> [ 82.174353] [<ffffffff81490372>] rt_mutex_lock+0x33/0x37
> [ 82.174356] [<ffffffff8108a0f2>] __rt_down_read+0x50/0x5a
> [ 82.174358] [<ffffffff8108a11c>] ? rt_down_read+0x10/0x12
> [ 82.174360] [<ffffffff8108a11c>] rt_down_read+0x10/0x12
> [ 82.174363] [<ffffffff810677b5>] __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x58/0x8d
> [ 82.174366] [<ffffffff810677fe>] blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x14/0x16
> [ 82.174369] [<ffffffff811dd272>] crypto_probing_notify+0x24/0x50
> [ 82.174372] [<ffffffff811debd6>] crypto_wait_for_test+0x22/0x6b
> [ 82.174374] [<ffffffff811decd3>] crypto_register_instance+0xb4/0xc0
> [ 82.174377] [<ffffffff811e9b76>] cryptd_create+0x378/0x3b6
> [ 82.174379] [<ffffffff811de512>] ? __crypto_lookup_template+0x5b/0x63
> [ 82.174382] [<ffffffff811e4545>] cryptomgr_probe+0x45/0xac
> [ 82.174385] [<ffffffff811e4500>] ? crypto_alloc_pcomp+0x1b/0x1b
> [ 82.174388] [<ffffffff81061161>] kthread+0x7e/0x86
> [ 82.174391] [<ffffffff8106d9dd>] ? finish_task_switch+0xaf/0xfa
> [ 82.174394] [<ffffffff814987c4>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
> [ 82.174398] [<ffffffff81491574>] ? retint_restore_args+0x13/0x13
> [ 82.174401] [<ffffffff810610e3>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x8c/0x8c
> [ 82.174403] [<ffffffff814987c0>] ? gs_change+0x13/0x13
>
> cryptomgr_test spawns the cryptomgr_probe thread from the notifier
> call. The probe thread fires the same notifier as the test thread and
> deadlocks on the rwsem on RT.
>
> Now this is a potential deadlock in mainline as well, because we have
> fifo fair rwsems. If another thread blocks with a down_write() on the
> notifier chain before the probe thread issues the down_read() it will
> block the probe thread and the whole party is dead locked.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> ---
> crypto/algapi.c | 4 ++--
> crypto/api.c | 6 +++---
> crypto/internal.h | 4 ++--
> 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/crypto/algapi.c
> +++ b/crypto/algapi.c
> @@ -683,13 +683,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(crypto_spawn_tfm2);
>
> int crypto_register_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb)
> {
> - return blocking_notifier_chain_register(&crypto_chain, nb);
> + return srcu_notifier_chain_register(&crypto_chain, nb);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(crypto_register_notifier);
>
> int crypto_unregister_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb)
> {
> - return blocking_notifier_chain_unregister(&crypto_chain, nb);
> + return srcu_notifier_chain_unregister(&crypto_chain, nb);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(crypto_unregister_notifier);
>
> --- a/crypto/api.c
> +++ b/crypto/api.c
> @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(crypto_alg_list);
> DECLARE_RWSEM(crypto_alg_sem);
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(crypto_alg_sem);
>
> -BLOCKING_NOTIFIER_HEAD(crypto_chain);
> +SRCU_NOTIFIER_HEAD(crypto_chain);
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(crypto_chain);
>
> static inline struct crypto_alg *crypto_alg_get(struct crypto_alg *alg)
> @@ -237,10 +237,10 @@ int crypto_probing_notify(unsigned long
> {
> int ok;
>
> - ok = blocking_notifier_call_chain(&crypto_chain, val, v);
> + ok = srcu_notifier_call_chain(&crypto_chain, val, v);
> if (ok == NOTIFY_DONE) {
> request_module("cryptomgr");
> - ok = blocking_notifier_call_chain(&crypto_chain, val, v);
> + ok = srcu_notifier_call_chain(&crypto_chain, val, v);
> }
>
> return ok;
> --- a/crypto/internal.h
> +++ b/crypto/internal.h
> @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ struct crypto_larval {
>
> extern struct list_head crypto_alg_list;
> extern struct rw_semaphore crypto_alg_sem;
> -extern struct blocking_notifier_head crypto_chain;
> +extern struct srcu_notifier_head crypto_chain;
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
> void __init crypto_init_proc(void);
> @@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ static inline int crypto_is_moribund(str
>
> static inline void crypto_notify(unsigned long val, void *v)
> {
> - blocking_notifier_call_chain(&crypto_chain, val, v);
> + srcu_notifier_call_chain(&crypto_chain, val, v);
> }
>
> #endif /* _CRYPTO_INTERNAL_H */
>
>> Thanks,
>> Lai
>
> Sebastian
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/3] kernel/SRCU: provide a static initializer
2013-04-12 2:56 ` Lai Jiangshan
@ 2013-04-16 18:20 ` Paul E. McKenney
0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Paul E. McKenney @ 2013-04-16 18:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lai Jiangshan
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior, linux-kernel, tglx, Peter Zijlstra,
Herbert Xu
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 10:56:27AM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> On 04/12/2013 01:04 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > * Lai Jiangshan | 2013-04-09 09:09:56 [+0800]:
> >
> >> If the percpu array can be defined in __SRCU_STRUCT_INIT(),
> >> I'm happy to expose it. but it is not currently.
> >
> > I have no idea how to achieve this.
> >
> >> Why crypto can't use boot time initialization?
> >
> > It would require something like this:
> > --- linux-stable.orig/crypto/Kconfig
> > +++ linux-stable/crypto/Kconfig
> > @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ source "crypto/async_tx/Kconfig"
> > # Cryptographic API Configuration
> > #
> > menuconfig CRYPTO
> > - tristate "Cryptographic API"
> > + bool "Cryptographic API"
> > help
> > This option provides the core Cryptographic API.
>
> Why convert to "bool"?
> srcu_init_notifier_head() can be called in module-load-time.
>
> >
> > --- linux-stable.orig/crypto/api.c
> > +++ linux-stable/crypto/api.c
> > @@ -34,6 +34,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(crypto_alg_sem);
> > struct srcu_notifier_head crypto_chain;
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(crypto_chain);
> >
> > +static int __init crypto_api_init(void)
> > +{
> > + srcu_init_notifier_head(&crypto_chain);
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +core_initcall(crypto_api_init);
> > +
> > static inline struct crypto_alg *crypto_alg_get(struct crypto_alg *alg)
> > {
> > atomic_inc(&alg->cra_refcnt);
>
> And again, why crypto can't use boot time nor module-load-time initialization?
Hello, Lai,
I believe that Sebastian's point is that compile-time initialization
would be easier to use and would reduce the amount of code that must
be written, reviewed, and executed.
Thanx, Paul
> > and there is no need for this.
> >
> >>> Do you have any idea how I could get it done without this? Do you want
> >>> to move/merge header files?
> >>
> >> if crypto has to use static initialization, I will find out some way
> >> or use your patch.
> >
> > The crypto would like this:
> >
> > Subject: crypto: Convert crypto notifier chain to SRCU
> > From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> > Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2012 09:03:24 +0100
> >
> > The crypto notifier deadlocks on RT. Though this can be a real deadlock
> > on mainline as well due to fifo fair rwsems.
> >
> > The involved parties here are:
> >
> > [ 82.172678] swapper/0 S 0000000000000001 0 1 0 0x00000000
> > [ 82.172682] ffff88042f18fcf0 0000000000000046 ffff88042f18fc80 ffffffff81491238
> > [ 82.172685] 0000000000011cc0 0000000000011cc0 ffff88042f18c040 ffff88042f18ffd8
> > [ 82.172688] 0000000000011cc0 0000000000011cc0 ffff88042f18ffd8 0000000000011cc0
> > [ 82.172689] Call Trace:
> > [ 82.172697] [<ffffffff81491238>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x6c/0x7a
> > [ 82.172701] [<ffffffff8148fd3f>] schedule+0x64/0x66
> > [ 82.172704] [<ffffffff8148ec6b>] schedule_timeout+0x27/0xd0
> > [ 82.172708] [<ffffffff81043c0c>] ? unpin_current_cpu+0x1a/0x6c
> > [ 82.172713] [<ffffffff8106e491>] ? migrate_enable+0x12f/0x141
> > [ 82.172716] [<ffffffff8148fbbd>] wait_for_common+0xbb/0x11f
> > [ 82.172719] [<ffffffff810709f2>] ? try_to_wake_up+0x182/0x182
> > [ 82.172722] [<ffffffff8148fc96>] wait_for_completion_interruptible+0x1d/0x2e
> > [ 82.172726] [<ffffffff811debfd>] crypto_wait_for_test+0x49/0x6b
> > [ 82.172728] [<ffffffff811ded32>] crypto_register_alg+0x53/0x5a
> > [ 82.172730] [<ffffffff811ded6c>] crypto_register_algs+0x33/0x72
> > [ 82.172734] [<ffffffff81ad7686>] ? aes_init+0x12/0x12
> > [ 82.172737] [<ffffffff81ad76ea>] aesni_init+0x64/0x66
> > [ 82.172741] [<ffffffff81000318>] do_one_initcall+0x7f/0x13b
> > [ 82.172744] [<ffffffff81ac4d34>] kernel_init+0x199/0x22c
> > [ 82.172747] [<ffffffff81ac44ef>] ? loglevel+0x31/0x31
> > [ 82.172752] [<ffffffff814987c4>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
> > [ 82.172755] [<ffffffff81491574>] ? retint_restore_args+0x13/0x13
> > [ 82.172759] [<ffffffff81ac4b9b>] ? start_kernel+0x3ca/0x3ca
> > [ 82.172761] [<ffffffff814987c0>] ? gs_change+0x13/0x13
> >
> > [ 82.174186] cryptomgr_test S 0000000000000001 0 41 2 0x00000000
> > [ 82.174189] ffff88042c971980 0000000000000046 ffffffff81d74830 0000000000000292
> > [ 82.174192] 0000000000011cc0 0000000000011cc0 ffff88042c96eb80 ffff88042c971fd8
> > [ 82.174195] 0000000000011cc0 0000000000011cc0 ffff88042c971fd8 0000000000011cc0
> > [ 82.174195] Call Trace:
> > [ 82.174198] [<ffffffff8148fd3f>] schedule+0x64/0x66
> > [ 82.174201] [<ffffffff8148ec6b>] schedule_timeout+0x27/0xd0
> > [ 82.174204] [<ffffffff81043c0c>] ? unpin_current_cpu+0x1a/0x6c
> > [ 82.174206] [<ffffffff8106e491>] ? migrate_enable+0x12f/0x141
> > [ 82.174209] [<ffffffff8148fbbd>] wait_for_common+0xbb/0x11f
> > [ 82.174212] [<ffffffff810709f2>] ? try_to_wake_up+0x182/0x182
> > [ 82.174215] [<ffffffff8148fc96>] wait_for_completion_interruptible+0x1d/0x2e
> > [ 82.174218] [<ffffffff811e4883>] cryptomgr_notify+0x280/0x385
> > [ 82.174221] [<ffffffff814943de>] notifier_call_chain+0x6b/0x98
> > [ 82.174224] [<ffffffff8108a11c>] ? rt_down_read+0x10/0x12
> > [ 82.174227] [<ffffffff810677cd>] __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x70/0x8d
> > [ 82.174230] [<ffffffff810677fe>] blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x14/0x16
> > [ 82.174234] [<ffffffff811dd272>] crypto_probing_notify+0x24/0x50
> > [ 82.174236] [<ffffffff811dd7a1>] crypto_alg_mod_lookup+0x3e/0x74
> > [ 82.174238] [<ffffffff811dd949>] crypto_alloc_base+0x36/0x8f
> > [ 82.174241] [<ffffffff811e9408>] cryptd_alloc_ablkcipher+0x6e/0xb5
> > [ 82.174243] [<ffffffff811dd591>] ? kzalloc.clone.5+0xe/0x10
> > [ 82.174246] [<ffffffff8103085d>] ablk_init_common+0x1d/0x38
> > [ 82.174249] [<ffffffff8103852a>] ablk_ecb_init+0x15/0x17
> > [ 82.174251] [<ffffffff811dd8c6>] __crypto_alloc_tfm+0xc7/0x114
> > [ 82.174254] [<ffffffff811e0caa>] ? crypto_lookup_skcipher+0x1f/0xe4
> > [ 82.174256] [<ffffffff811e0dcf>] crypto_alloc_ablkcipher+0x60/0xa5
> > [ 82.174258] [<ffffffff811e5bde>] alg_test_skcipher+0x24/0x9b
> > [ 82.174261] [<ffffffff8106d96d>] ? finish_task_switch+0x3f/0xfa
> > [ 82.174263] [<ffffffff811e6b8e>] alg_test+0x16f/0x1d7
> > [ 82.174267] [<ffffffff811e45ac>] ? cryptomgr_probe+0xac/0xac
> > [ 82.174269] [<ffffffff811e45d8>] cryptomgr_test+0x2c/0x47
> > [ 82.174272] [<ffffffff81061161>] kthread+0x7e/0x86
> > [ 82.174275] [<ffffffff8106d9dd>] ? finish_task_switch+0xaf/0xfa
> > [ 82.174278] [<ffffffff814987c4>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
> > [ 82.174281] [<ffffffff81491574>] ? retint_restore_args+0x13/0x13
> > [ 82.174284] [<ffffffff810610e3>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x8c/0x8c
> > [ 82.174287] [<ffffffff814987c0>] ? gs_change+0x13/0x13
> >
> > [ 82.174329] cryptomgr_probe D 0000000000000002 0 47 2 0x00000000
> > [ 82.174332] ffff88042c991b70 0000000000000046 ffff88042c991bb0 0000000000000006
> > [ 82.174335] 0000000000011cc0 0000000000011cc0 ffff88042c98ed00 ffff88042c991fd8
> > [ 82.174338] 0000000000011cc0 0000000000011cc0 ffff88042c991fd8 0000000000011cc0
> > [ 82.174338] Call Trace:
> > [ 82.174342] [<ffffffff8148fd3f>] schedule+0x64/0x66
> > [ 82.174344] [<ffffffff814901ad>] __rt_mutex_slowlock+0x85/0xbe
> > [ 82.174347] [<ffffffff814902d2>] rt_mutex_slowlock+0xec/0x159
> > [ 82.174351] [<ffffffff81089c4d>] rt_mutex_fastlock.clone.8+0x29/0x2f
> > [ 82.174353] [<ffffffff81490372>] rt_mutex_lock+0x33/0x37
> > [ 82.174356] [<ffffffff8108a0f2>] __rt_down_read+0x50/0x5a
> > [ 82.174358] [<ffffffff8108a11c>] ? rt_down_read+0x10/0x12
> > [ 82.174360] [<ffffffff8108a11c>] rt_down_read+0x10/0x12
> > [ 82.174363] [<ffffffff810677b5>] __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x58/0x8d
> > [ 82.174366] [<ffffffff810677fe>] blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x14/0x16
> > [ 82.174369] [<ffffffff811dd272>] crypto_probing_notify+0x24/0x50
> > [ 82.174372] [<ffffffff811debd6>] crypto_wait_for_test+0x22/0x6b
> > [ 82.174374] [<ffffffff811decd3>] crypto_register_instance+0xb4/0xc0
> > [ 82.174377] [<ffffffff811e9b76>] cryptd_create+0x378/0x3b6
> > [ 82.174379] [<ffffffff811de512>] ? __crypto_lookup_template+0x5b/0x63
> > [ 82.174382] [<ffffffff811e4545>] cryptomgr_probe+0x45/0xac
> > [ 82.174385] [<ffffffff811e4500>] ? crypto_alloc_pcomp+0x1b/0x1b
> > [ 82.174388] [<ffffffff81061161>] kthread+0x7e/0x86
> > [ 82.174391] [<ffffffff8106d9dd>] ? finish_task_switch+0xaf/0xfa
> > [ 82.174394] [<ffffffff814987c4>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
> > [ 82.174398] [<ffffffff81491574>] ? retint_restore_args+0x13/0x13
> > [ 82.174401] [<ffffffff810610e3>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x8c/0x8c
> > [ 82.174403] [<ffffffff814987c0>] ? gs_change+0x13/0x13
> >
> > cryptomgr_test spawns the cryptomgr_probe thread from the notifier
> > call. The probe thread fires the same notifier as the test thread and
> > deadlocks on the rwsem on RT.
> >
> > Now this is a potential deadlock in mainline as well, because we have
> > fifo fair rwsems. If another thread blocks with a down_write() on the
> > notifier chain before the probe thread issues the down_read() it will
> > block the probe thread and the whole party is dead locked.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> > ---
> > crypto/algapi.c | 4 ++--
> > crypto/api.c | 6 +++---
> > crypto/internal.h | 4 ++--
> > 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >
> > --- a/crypto/algapi.c
> > +++ b/crypto/algapi.c
> > @@ -683,13 +683,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(crypto_spawn_tfm2);
> >
> > int crypto_register_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb)
> > {
> > - return blocking_notifier_chain_register(&crypto_chain, nb);
> > + return srcu_notifier_chain_register(&crypto_chain, nb);
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(crypto_register_notifier);
> >
> > int crypto_unregister_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb)
> > {
> > - return blocking_notifier_chain_unregister(&crypto_chain, nb);
> > + return srcu_notifier_chain_unregister(&crypto_chain, nb);
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(crypto_unregister_notifier);
> >
> > --- a/crypto/api.c
> > +++ b/crypto/api.c
> > @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(crypto_alg_list);
> > DECLARE_RWSEM(crypto_alg_sem);
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(crypto_alg_sem);
> >
> > -BLOCKING_NOTIFIER_HEAD(crypto_chain);
> > +SRCU_NOTIFIER_HEAD(crypto_chain);
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(crypto_chain);
> >
> > static inline struct crypto_alg *crypto_alg_get(struct crypto_alg *alg)
> > @@ -237,10 +237,10 @@ int crypto_probing_notify(unsigned long
> > {
> > int ok;
> >
> > - ok = blocking_notifier_call_chain(&crypto_chain, val, v);
> > + ok = srcu_notifier_call_chain(&crypto_chain, val, v);
> > if (ok == NOTIFY_DONE) {
> > request_module("cryptomgr");
> > - ok = blocking_notifier_call_chain(&crypto_chain, val, v);
> > + ok = srcu_notifier_call_chain(&crypto_chain, val, v);
> > }
> >
> > return ok;
> > --- a/crypto/internal.h
> > +++ b/crypto/internal.h
> > @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ struct crypto_larval {
> >
> > extern struct list_head crypto_alg_list;
> > extern struct rw_semaphore crypto_alg_sem;
> > -extern struct blocking_notifier_head crypto_chain;
> > +extern struct srcu_notifier_head crypto_chain;
> >
> > #ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
> > void __init crypto_init_proc(void);
> > @@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ static inline int crypto_is_moribund(str
> >
> > static inline void crypto_notify(unsigned long val, void *v)
> > {
> > - blocking_notifier_call_chain(&crypto_chain, val, v);
> > + srcu_notifier_call_chain(&crypto_chain, val, v);
> > }
> >
> > #endif /* _CRYPTO_INTERNAL_H */
> >
> >> Thanks,
> >> Lai
> >
> > Sebastian
> >
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-04-16 18:21 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-03-19 14:16 [PATCH 1/3] kernel/srcu: merge common code into a macro Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-03-19 14:16 ` [PATCH 2/3] kernel/SRCU: provide a static initializer Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-04-05 7:21 ` Lai Jiangshan
2013-04-08 10:03 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-04-09 1:09 ` Lai Jiangshan
2013-04-11 17:04 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-04-12 2:56 ` Lai Jiangshan
2013-04-16 18:20 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-03-19 14:16 ` [PATCH 3/3] cpufreq: use static initializer for the SRCU notifier Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-03-19 16:22 ` [PATCH 1/3] kernel/srcu: merge common code into a macro Joe Perches
2013-03-19 18:15 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-04-05 7:21 ` Lai Jiangshan
2013-04-08 10:05 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.