From: Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>
To: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"mingo@elte.hu" <mingo@elte.hu>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>,
Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@arm.com>,
"ak@linux.intel.com" <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@gmail.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com>,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] perf: need to expose sched_clock to correlate user samples with kernel samples
Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2013 17:29:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1365092963.26858.107.camel@hornet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <515C6C01.9070905@linaro.org>
On Wed, 2013-04-03 at 18:50 +0100, John Stultz wrote:
> I get the reasoning around reusing the fd we already have, but is the
> possibility of a dynamic chardev pathname really a big concern?
Well, in my particular development system I have no udev, so I had to
manually do "mknod". Perf syscall works out of the box. Of course one
could say it's my problem...
> I'm guessing the private_data on the perf file is already used?
Of course.
> Maybe can we extend the dynamic posix clock code to work on more then
> just the chardev?
The idea I'm following now is to make the dynamic clock framework even
more generic, so there could be a clock associated with an arbitrary
struct file * (the perf syscall is getting one with
anon_inode_getfile()). I don't know how to get this done yet, but I'll
give it a try and report.
Paweł
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-04 16:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-16 10:13 [RFC] perf: need to expose sched_clock to correlate user samples with kernel samples Stephane Eranian
2012-10-16 17:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-10-18 19:33 ` Stephane Eranian
2012-11-10 2:04 ` John Stultz
2012-11-11 20:32 ` Stephane Eranian
2012-11-12 18:53 ` John Stultz
2012-11-12 20:54 ` Stephane Eranian
2012-11-12 22:39 ` John Stultz
2012-11-13 20:58 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-11-14 22:26 ` John Stultz
2012-11-14 23:30 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-02-01 14:18 ` Pawel Moll
2013-02-05 21:18 ` David Ahern
2013-02-05 22:13 ` Stephane Eranian
2013-02-05 22:28 ` John Stultz
2013-02-06 1:19 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-02-06 18:17 ` Pawel Moll
2013-02-13 20:00 ` Stephane Eranian
2013-02-14 10:33 ` Pawel Moll
2013-02-18 15:16 ` Stephane Eranian
2013-02-18 18:59 ` David Ahern
2013-02-18 20:35 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-02-19 18:25 ` John Stultz
2013-02-19 19:55 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-02-19 20:15 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-02-19 20:35 ` John Stultz
2013-02-19 21:50 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-02-19 22:20 ` John Stultz
2013-02-20 10:06 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-02-20 10:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-02-23 6:04 ` John Stultz
2013-02-25 14:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-03-14 15:34 ` Stephane Eranian
2013-03-14 19:57 ` Pawel Moll
2013-03-31 16:23 ` David Ahern
2013-04-01 18:29 ` John Stultz
2013-04-01 22:29 ` David Ahern
2013-04-01 23:12 ` John Stultz
2013-04-03 9:17 ` Stephane Eranian
2013-04-03 13:55 ` David Ahern
2013-04-03 14:00 ` Stephane Eranian
2013-04-03 14:14 ` David Ahern
2013-04-03 14:22 ` Stephane Eranian
2013-04-03 17:57 ` John Stultz
2013-04-04 8:12 ` Stephane Eranian
2013-04-04 22:26 ` John Stultz
2013-04-02 7:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-04-02 16:05 ` Pawel Moll
2013-04-02 16:19 ` John Stultz
2013-04-02 16:34 ` Pawel Moll
2013-04-03 17:19 ` Pawel Moll
2013-04-03 17:29 ` John Stultz
2013-04-03 17:35 ` Pawel Moll
2013-04-03 17:50 ` John Stultz
2013-04-04 7:37 ` Richard Cochran
2013-04-04 16:33 ` Pawel Moll
2013-04-04 16:29 ` Pawel Moll [this message]
2013-04-05 18:16 ` Pawel Moll
2013-04-06 11:05 ` Richard Cochran
2013-04-08 17:58 ` Pawel Moll
2013-04-08 19:05 ` John Stultz
2013-04-09 5:02 ` Richard Cochran
2013-02-06 18:17 ` Pawel Moll
2013-06-26 16:49 ` David Ahern
2013-07-15 10:44 ` Pawel Moll
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1365092963.26858.107.camel@hornet \
--to=pawel.moll@arm.com \
--cc=Will.Deacon@arm.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=anton@samba.org \
--cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=penberg@gmail.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
--cc=robert.richter@amd.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.