From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: sandeep suresh <sandeep.suresh@yahoo.co.in>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 10:37:31 +0800 (SGT)
Subject: [ath9k-devel] AR9287 ; 2-wire coexistence expected behavior
In-Reply-To: <CAJ-Vmo===nANf3g5psxf3aV7L8jVQ8mjRP+1WM0PSS9PgcGHBA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAJ-VmomdLY-APqZKTcW9GpfokkrPqDGVoTavj=wwjZpj_yL14A@mail.gmail.com>
	<515A0847.7000306@gmail.com>
	<1365088789.89181.YahooMailNeo@web193504.mail.sg3.yahoo.com>
	<CAJ-VmoksRR8Xd4wEM_obENyP1mFqbgKDm+DEjLS=W8WAPBPLRg@mail.gmail.com>
	<1365131280.68622.YahooMailNeo@web193506.mail.sg3.yahoo.com>
	<CAJ-VmokqjXqkJEN1cwgsOcJ7p8cvCsRxUG8Qc9gE8fWXaq+E0g@mail.gmail.com>
	<1365148844.61162.YahooMailNeo@web193503.mail.sg3.yahoo.com>
	<CAJ-VmonhbW06GU30S9oKYTEvbum2WbY63Y07tvS=ZQJcB6o+Dg@mail.gmail.com>
	<1365152761.13005.YahooMailNeo@web193505.mail.sg3.yahoo.com>
	<20830.46610.23754.783231@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
	<1365175482.75704.YahooMailNeo@web193505.mail.sg3.yahoo.com>
	<CAJ-VmomFi1fq6GY2dCpJCGN-sfmaH+FEu0V1nCjc7MymT6f3Rg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJ-Vmo=uvZbUtKE5Pk=saipVLRfmrU6jQeEvCg2kULP6F+d6cg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJ-VmomYF3ziqhykXMK5U+SJPYiNWmijdf0VhKDK33BVbSKNrQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<1365346495.79596.YahooMailNeo@web193506.mail.sg3.yahoo.com>
	<1365398445.32740.YahooMailNeo@web193504.mail.sg3.yahoo.com>
	<CAJ-VmomGT4grPwA0dSGqPD=Zi=dZk6WwpqKEXXDvfLUqr08o0w@mail.gmail.com>
	<1365413949.24195.YahooMailNeo@web193502.mail.sg3.yahoo.com>
	<1365433751.96373.YahooMailNeo@web193505.mail.sg3.yahoo.com>
	<CAJ-Vmon4K_sFR3JP47YGP13HtepEg=mt3=Y8nQX8fV+cdFZ5rg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJ-Vmo===nANf3g5psxf3aV7L8jVQ8mjRP+1WM0PSS9PgcGHBA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1365561451.4973.YahooMailNeo@web193504.mail.sg3.yahoo.com>
List-Id: <ath9k-devel.lists.ath9k.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org

Hello Mr.Adrian,
????Thanks for your response. During googling, I had come across the following 2-wire coexistence solution from owl modules.
?http://support.connectblue.com/display/PRODWLAN/cB-OWL22x+Bluetooth+co-existence+application+note
According to this application note, for 2-wire coexistence, WLAN_ACTIVE and BT_PRIORITY signals are used rather than WLAN_ACTIVE and BT_ACTIVE.? What is your opinion on this? And as I understand owl modules are based on Atheros chipsets.
?
Regards
Sandeep.


________________________________
From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>
To: sandeep suresh <sandeep.suresh@yahoo.co.in> 
Cc: Sujith Manoharan <sujith@msujith.org>; ath9k-devel <ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org>; "linux-wireless at vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org> 
Sent: Wednesday, 10 April 2013 4:30 AM
Subject: Re: [ath9k-devel] AR9287 ; 2-wire coexistence expected behavior


Hi,

Yes, "WLAN_ACTIVE" here is just both TX and RX activity.

So if it were working, that would stay low.



adrian
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.ath9k.org/pipermail/ath9k-devel/attachments/20130410/05d18aba/attachment.htm