From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: sandeep suresh Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 14:13:32 +0800 (SGT) Subject: [ath9k-devel] AR9287 ; 2-wire coexistence expected behavior In-Reply-To: References: <515A0847.7000306@gmail.com> <1365088789.89181.YahooMailNeo@web193504.mail.sg3.yahoo.com> <1365131280.68622.YahooMailNeo@web193506.mail.sg3.yahoo.com> <1365148844.61162.YahooMailNeo@web193503.mail.sg3.yahoo.com> <1365152761.13005.YahooMailNeo@web193505.mail.sg3.yahoo.com> <20830.46610.23754.783231@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <1365175482.75704.YahooMailNeo@web193505.mail.sg3.yahoo.com> <1365346495.79596.YahooMailNeo@web193506.mail.sg3.yahoo.com> <1365413949.24195.YahooMailNeo@web193502.mail.sg3.yahoo.com> <1365433751.96373.YahooMailNeo@web193505.mail.sg3.yahoo.com> <1365561451.4973.YahooMailNeo@web193504.mail.sg3.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <1365574412.20937.YahooMailNeo@web193505.mail.sg3.yahoo.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org Hello Mr.Adrian, ????Thanks for your response. I understand the following: Please correct if I am wrong. 1. With WLAN_ACTIVE and BT_ACTIVE, the wireless medium is managed between BT and WLAN without stomping the traffic. 2. With WLAN_ACTIVE, BT_ACTIVE and BT_PRIORITY, WiFI traffic stomping is possible. ? Regards Sandeep. ________________________________ From: Adrian Chadd To: sandeep suresh Cc: Sujith Manoharan ; ath9k-devel ; "linux-wireless at vger.kernel.org" Sent: Wednesday, 10 April 2013 11:07 AM Subject: Re: [ath9k-devel] AR9287 ; 2-wire coexistence expected behavior Right, but same deal - if it asserts the line, it should stomp wifi transmission in your particular scheme. adrian On 9 April 2013 19:37, sandeep suresh wrote: > Hello Mr.Adrian, >? ? Thanks for your response. During googling, I had come across the > following 2-wire coexistence solution from owl modules. > > http://support.connectblue.com/display/PRODWLAN/cB-OWL22x+Bluetooth+co-existence+application+note > According to this application note, for 2-wire coexistence, WLAN_ACTIVE and > BT_PRIORITY signals are used rather than WLAN_ACTIVE and BT_ACTIVE.? What is > your opinion on this? And as I understand owl modules are based on Atheros > chipsets. > > Regards > Sandeep. > > From: Adrian Chadd > To: sandeep suresh > Cc: Sujith Manoharan ; ath9k-devel > ; "linux-wireless at vger.kernel.org" > > Sent: Wednesday, 10 April 2013 4:30 AM > > Subject: Re: [ath9k-devel] AR9287 ; 2-wire coexistence expected behavior > > Hi, > > Yes, "WLAN_ACTIVE" here is just both TX and RX activity. > > So if it were working, that would stay low. > > > > adrian > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.ath9k.org/pipermail/ath9k-devel/attachments/20130410/eb89df8b/attachment-0001.htm