From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Dario Faggioli <raistlin@linux.it>
Subject: Re: [Hackathon minutes] PV frontends/backends and NUMA
 machines
Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 12:58:14 +0200
Message-ID: <1369133894.12423.52.camel@Solace>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1305201443510.4799@kaball.uk.xensource.com>
	<CAFLBxZbonzEwo4mF6PTSq6WQjU2haN_Ray-Z_3Td83i=f7zsbA@mail.gmail.com>
	<20130521083251.GD9626@ocelot.phlegethon.org>
	<CAFLBxZbSj0E7r9pmFpcpTFtBQOQsDK4NcftUEULqemBksEab3g@mail.gmail.com>
	<519B632902000078000D79C4@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
	<1369132208.12423.41.camel@Solace>
	<519B6BFE02000078000D7A5A@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1433601446998844790=="
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
In-Reply-To: <519B6BFE02000078000D7A5A@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com>, "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>, Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>, Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org


--===============1433601446998844790==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature";
	boundary="=-mpz54IxR6qZp8oF3GWYx"


--=-mpz54IxR6qZp8oF3GWYx
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On mar, 2013-05-21 at 11:43 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 21.05.13 at 12:30, Dario Faggioli <raistlin@linux.it> wrote:
> > I remember such discussion (which, BTW, is here:
> > http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2012-08/msg00332.html ).
> > However, wasn't that supposed to help only in case you want to confine
> > Dom0 on one specific node?
> >=20
> > That would definitely be already something, but not quite the same thin=
g
> > that came up in Dublin, and that George was describing above (although =
I
> > agree it covers a sensible subset of it :-) ).
>=20
> I certainly meant to implement both such that multiple nodes would
> be permitted.
>=20
Well, sure, but then, again, how do you control which (and not only how
much) memory is taken from which node?

Dario

--=20
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)


--=-mpz54IxR6qZp8oF3GWYx
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEABECAAYFAlGbU0YACgkQk4XaBE3IOsT04wCcCqun4kCayjbTNx/539MrCiwx
vIoAmQGvpkoB18VSvQza8hQAO95PQOTj
=5dMN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-mpz54IxR6qZp8oF3GWYx--



--===============1433601446998844790==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

--===============1433601446998844790==--