From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756011Ab3EVMam (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 May 2013 08:30:42 -0400 Received: from mail-pa0-f54.google.com ([209.85.220.54]:62227 "EHLO mail-pa0-f54.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755661Ab3EVMal (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 May 2013 08:30:41 -0400 Message-ID: <1369225837.3301.324.camel@edumazet-glaptop> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] rcu: fix a race in hlist_nulls_for_each_entry_rcu macro From: Eric Dumazet To: Roman Gushchin Cc: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Dipankar Sarma , zhmurov@yandex-team.ru, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" , Alexey Kuznetsov , James Morris , Hideaki YOSHIFUJI , Patrick McHardy Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 05:30:37 -0700 In-Reply-To: <519CB2D8.103@yandex-team.ru> References: <519B38EC.90401@yandex-team.ru> <20130521120906.GD3578@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1369143885.3301.221.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <519B8908.9080007@yandex-team.ru> <1369150693.3301.233.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <519BB90B.6080706@yandex-team.ru> <1369188080.3301.268.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <1369201765.3301.299.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <519CB2D8.103@yandex-team.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3-0ubuntu6 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2013-05-22 at 15:58 +0400, Roman Gushchin wrote: > +/* > + * Same as ACCESS_ONCE(), but used for accessing field of a structure. > + * The main goal is preventing compiler to store &ptr->field in a register. But &ptr->field is a constant during the whole duration of udp4_lib_lookup2() and could be in a register, in my case field is at offset 0, and ptr is a parameter (so could be in a 'register') The bug you found is that compiler caches the indirection (ptr->field) into a register, not that compiler stores &ptr->field into a register. > + */ > +#define ACCESS_FIELD_ONCE(PTR, FIELD) (((volatile typeof(*PTR) *)PTR)->FIELD) > + Here we force the compiler to consider ptr as volatile, but semantically it is not required in rcu_dereference(ptr->field) We want field to be reloaded, not ptr. So yes, the patch appears to fix the bug, but it sounds not logical to me.