From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756766Ab3EVSMD (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 May 2013 14:12:03 -0400 Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([71.74.56.122]:3950 "EHLO hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755970Ab3EVSMA (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 May 2013 14:12:00 -0400 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=IZAFqBWa c=1 sm=0 a=rXTBtCOcEpjy1lPqhTCpEQ==:17 a=mNMOxpOpBa8A:10 a=rKI68ldaRsEA:10 a=5SG0PmZfjMsA:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=meVymXHHAAAA:8 a=54K5z7jWVYMA:10 a=4QIxAgZS9Tt0D_6QZzoA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=rXTBtCOcEpjy1lPqhTCpEQ==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Authenticated-User: X-Originating-IP: 74.67.115.198 Message-ID: <1369246316.6828.176.camel@gandalf.local.home> Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: fix up a spurious page fault whenever it happens From: Steven Rostedt To: Stanislav Meduna Cc: Rik van Riel , Linus Torvalds , "linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , the arch/x86 maintainers , Hai Huang Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 14:11:56 -0400 In-Reply-To: <519D08B0.8050707@meduna.org> References: <5195ED8B.7060002@meduna.org> <1369183168.6828.168.camel@gandalf.local.home> <519CBB30.3060200@redhat.com> <20130522134111.33a695c5@cuia.bos.redhat.com> <519D08B0.8050707@meduna.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.4.4-3 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2013-05-22 at 20:04 +0200, Stanislav Meduna wrote: > On 22.05.2013 19:41, Rik van Riel wrote: > > >> I think you should also remove the > >> > >> if (flags & FAULT_FLAG_WRITE) > > Done > > >>> Can you test the attached patch? > > Nope. Fails with the same symptoms, min_flt skyrockets, > the throttler activates and after 2 seconds all is well > again. > > This is on Geode LX, I don't have the Celeron M at the hand now. > Did you apply both patches? Without the first one, this one is meaningless. -- Steve