From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752854Ab3FNQMU (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Jun 2013 12:12:20 -0400 Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([71.74.56.122]:15420 "EHLO hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752655Ab3FNQMR (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Jun 2013 12:12:17 -0400 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=KtrPKBqN c=1 sm=0 a=rXTBtCOcEpjy1lPqhTCpEQ==:17 a=mNMOxpOpBa8A:10 a=tkaDFPjYVEIA:10 a=5SG0PmZfjMsA:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=meVymXHHAAAA:8 a=KGjhK52YXX0A:10 a=apdwqXrHFoAA:10 a=iwrn97SKuRVz8EZBcckA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=rXTBtCOcEpjy1lPqhTCpEQ==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Authenticated-User: X-Originating-IP: 74.67.115.198 Message-ID: <1371226336.9844.328.camel@gandalf.local.home> Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] watchdog: Boot-disable by default on full dynticks From: Steven Rostedt To: anish singh Cc: Paul McKenney , Don Zickus , Frederic Weisbecker , Peter Zijlstra , LKML , Ingo Molnar , Andrew Morton , Thomas Gleixner , Li Zhong , "Srivatsa S. Bhat" Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 12:12:16 -0400 In-Reply-To: References: <20130613131057.GA15997@somewhere> <20130613140207.GW133453@redhat.com> <20130613142210.GD16339@somewhere> <20130613144515.GX133453@redhat.com> <20130613145601.GE16339@somewhere> <20130613152059.GA133453@redhat.com> <1371138491.9844.288.camel@gandalf.local.home> <1371143779.9844.297.camel@gandalf.local.home> <20130614122608.GK5146@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.4.4-3 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2013-06-14 at 21:33 +0530, anish singh wrote: > May I know why we zeroed in on 1Hz? Is there any logical reason > or just because it is above 0Hz? > > We had to keep a tick. What number would you have picked? -- Steve